Is psychosis an ‘immune disorder’?

A fascinating new study has just been published which found evidence for the immune system attacking a neuroreceptor in the brain in a small proportion of people with psychosis. It’s an interesting study that probably reflects what’s going to be a cultural tipping point for the idea of ‘immune system mental health problems’ or ‘madness as inflammation disorder’ but it’s worth being a little wary of the coming hype.

This new study, published in The Lancet Psychiatry, did blood tests on people who presented with their first episode of psychosis and looked for antibodies that attack specific receptors in the brain. Receptors are what receive neurotransmitters – the brain’s chemical signals – and allow information to be transferred around the nervous system, so disruption to these can cause brain disturbances.

The most scientifically interesting finding is that the research team found a type of antibody that attacks NMDA receptors in 7 patients (3%) out of 228, but zero controls.

The study found markers for other neuroreceptors that the immune system was attacking, but the reason the NMDA finding is so crucial is because it shows evidence of a condition called anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis which is known to cause episodes of psychosis that can be indistinguishable from ‘regular’ psychosis but for which the best treatment is dealing with the autoimmune problem.

It was only discovered in 2007 but there has been a long-running suspicion that it may be the best explanation for a small minority of cases of psychosis which can be easily misdiagnosed as schizophrenia.

Importantly, the findings from this research have been supported by another independent study that has just been published online. The two studies used different ranges for the concentration of NMDA antibodies they measured, but they came up with roughly the same figures.

It also chimes with a growing debate about the role of the immune system in mental health. A lot of this evidence is circumstantial but suggestive. For example, many of the genes associated (albeit weakly) with the diagnosis of schizophrenia are involved in the immune system – particularly in coding proteins for the major histocompatibility complex.

However, it’s worth being a little circumspect about this new enthusiasm for thinking of psychosis as an ‘immune disorder’.

Importantly, these new studies did blood tests, rather than checking cerebrospinal fluid – the fluid that your brain floats around in which lies on the other side of the blood-brain barrier, so we can’t be sure that these antibodies were actually affecting the brain in everyone found to have them. It’s likely, but not certain.

Also, we’re not sure to what extent anti-NMDA antibodies contribute to the chance of developing psychosis in everyone. Certainly there are some cases where it seems to be the main cause, but we’re not sure how that holds for all.

It’s also worth bearing in mind that the science over the role of the genes associated with the schizophrenia diagnosis in the immune system is certainly not settled. A recent large study compared the role of these genes in schizophrenia to known autoimmune disorders and concluded that the genes just don’t look like they’re actually impacting on the immune system.

There’s also a constant background of cultural enthusiasm in psychiatry to identify ‘biomarkers’ and anything that looks like a clear common biological pathway even for a small number of cases of ‘psychiatric’ problem gets a lot of airtime.

Curiously, in this case, Hollywood may also play a part.

A film called Brain On Fire has just been shown to film festivals and is being tested for a possible big release. It’s based on the (excellent) book of the same name by journalist Susannah Cahalan and describes her experience of developing psychosis only for it later to be discovered that she had anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.

Hollywood has historically had a big effect on discussions about mental health and you can be sure that if the movie becomes a hit, popular media will be alive with discussions on ‘whether your mental health problems are really an immune problem’.

But taking a less glitzy view, in terms of these new studies, they probably reflect that a small percentage of people with psychosis, maybe 1-2%, have NMDA receptor-related immune problems that play an important role in the generation of their mental health difficulties.

It’s important not to underestimate the importance of these findings. It could potentially translate into more effective treatment for millions of people a year globally.

But in terms of psychosis as a whole, for which we know social adversity in its many forms plays a massive role, it’s just a small piece of the puzzle.
 

Link to locked Lancet Psychiatry study.

5 thoughts on “Is psychosis an ‘immune disorder’?”

  1. I suspect that the more we discover about the adverse effects of inflammation on the nervous system, the more links and correlations we’ll find to all kinds of human suffering. Here, for example, Margaret McCarthy at the University of Maryland, documents the central role of microglia in disproportionately impacting the neuroimmune function of women’s brains with great adverse consequences.

  2. Regarding psychosis. Putting people in jail before they commit a crime is just a small piece of the puzzle? Giving people mind altering medicines/drugs, then saying “I told you they were mentally ill” is just a small piece?

  3. This is possibly another pellagra moment…in terms of significance…

    So I think it is a shame to downplay the importance of this and the potentially very productive focus on anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapy plus timely effective treatment of any triggering infection. I know that there is always a worry about patient compliance, and therefore a reluctance to introduce any doubts about legitimacy of diagnosis and prescriptions. I think that the experience of truly effective treatment will have a huge effect on that, especially if followed by explanation of mechanism involved in producing symptoms and the ways that the different therapies help (antipsychotics/AEDs for behavioural effects,anti-infectives, steroid taper, immunotherapy, plasmapheresis) and the ending of this fixation on family history (potentially equally mislabelled/mistreated because the immune dysregulation has a genetic component) that diverts people into the mental health system, at which point all other signs and symptoms disappear.

    Key is cytokine response and its effect on BBB
    TH17+ cells in F.E.P, drug naive… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447943
    TH17+ levels correlating positively with PANSS and aggression, Complement C3 negatively… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829509

    Recurrent upper respiratory infection S. Pyogenes (human obligate pathogen i.e just us humans) TH17+cells from tonsils etc -> olfactory bulb ->BBB breach -> access to brain by whatever circulating antibodies. Animal model… https://www.jci.org/articles/view/80792
    Similarly, another common human pathogen H. Pylori causes chronic TH17+ related inflammation in the gut- even after elimination of detectable infection (though possibly reservoirs persist as biofilm). Stomach ulcers were also considered a ‘mental’ problem in the past, caused by ‘nerves’…i.e behavioural symptoms not the inflammation, or the infection itself, were the focus.
    Old friends, huh.

    Elevated TH17+ response probably selected for as it would have prevented death from puerperal fever, pre-penicillin:
    http://www.nature.com/articles/srep26836
    nicotine, old anti-inflammatory friend of many, self-administered PRN:
    http://www.smartscitech.com/index.php/NT/article/view/1303

    In terms of social adversity it’s a case of al perro flaco…

  4. Another important piece of the puzzle is the recent discovery of the system of lymph vessels in the brain (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v523/n7560/full/nature14432.html). Glymphatic system compromise would leave inflammatory cytokines and other toxic soluble proteins unchecked and free to wreak havoc on neurons and synapses. It will be interesting to see as more research delves into characterizing the distinct pattern of neuroinflammation specific to each psychiatric and neurological disorder.

Leave a comment