Want to enhance your memory for facts? Tom Stafford explains a counterintuitive method for retaining information.
If I asked you to sit down and remember a list of phone numbers or a series of facts, how would you go about it? There’s a fair chance that you’d be doing it wrong.
One of the interesting things about the mind is that even though we all have one, we don’t have perfect insight into how to get the best from it. This is in part because of flaws in our ability to think about our own thinking, which is called metacognition. Studying this self-reflective thought process reveals that the human species has mental blind spots.
One area where these blind spots are particularly large is learning. We’re actually surprisingly bad at having insight into how we learn best.
Researchers Jeffrey Karpicke and Henry Roediger III set out to look at one aspect: how testing can consolidate our memory of facts. In their experiment they asked college students to learn pairs of Swahili and English words. So, for example, they had to learn that if they were given the Swahili word ‘mashua’ the correct response was ‘boat’. They could have used the sort of facts you might get on a high-school quiz (e.g. “Who wrote the first computer programs?”/”Ada Lovelace”), but the use of Swahili meant that there was little chance their participants could use any background knowledge to help them learn. After the pairs had all been learnt, there would be a final test a week later.
Now if many of us were revising this list we might study the list, test ourselves and then repeat this cycle, dropping items we got right. This makes studying (and testing) quicker and allows us to focus our effort on the things we haven’t yet learnt. It’s a plan that seems to make perfect sense, but it’s a plan that is disastrous if we really want to learn properly.
Karpicke and Roediger asked students to prepare for a test in various ways, and compared their success – for example, one group kept testing themselves on all items without dropping what they were getting right, while another group stopped testing themselves on their correct answers.
On the final exam differences between the groups were dramatic. While dropping items from study didn’t have much of an effect, the people who dropped items from testing performed relatively poorly: they could only remember about 35% of the word pairs, compared to 80% for people who kept testing items after they had learnt them.
It seems the effective way to learn is to practice retrieving items from memory, not trying to cement them in there by further study. Moreover, dropping items entirely from your revision, which is the advice given by many study guides, is wrong. You can stop studying them if you’ve learnt them, but you should keep testing what you’ve learnt if you want to remember them at the time of the final exam.
Finally, the researchers had the neat idea of asking their participants how well they would remember what they had learnt. All groups guessed at about 50%. This was a large overestimate for those who dropped items from test (and an underestimate from those who kept testing learnt items).
So it seems that we have a metacognitive blind spot for which revision strategies will work best. Making this a situation where we need to be guided by the evidence, and not our instinct. But the evidence has a moral for teachers as well: there’s more to testing than finding out what students know – tests can also help us remember.
Read more: Why cramming for tests often fails
This is my BBC Future column from last week. The original is here
5 thoughts on “A simple trick to improve your memory”
Reblogged this on peakmemory and commented:
“We’re actually surprisingly bad at having insight into how we learn best.”
This reminds me of how I once bought and read a book about how to improve memory by linking together a set of items – basically by creating an imaginative ‘story’ to connect things in my mind.
It sounded like a great idea and may have worked, but I never really got the motivation/will to put it into actual practice. I guess I decided my memory was good enough.
This method would not work for people struggle to think creatively and creating stories, so instead of studying you’ll sit there for hours trying to think of an imaginative scenario. This method would also be difficult to use when studying a subject such as math. I think a person’s study method should depend on the way you think: does your brain work in terms of pictures or numbers. A reliable way to determine this would be to do a personality test.
If your study method has been working don’t second guess yourself unless you feel bored with it. Studying is such a privilege, there are so many people who aren’t as fortunate to be educated, therefore make study time fun instead of a torture session.
I stumbled on this years ago when learning Spanish vocabulary. I had been writing words over and over and it just didn’t work. Once I started testing myself on a list of ten words I found I could memorize them in 5 minutes as long as each individual word was tested 5 or 6 times. I now have a huge Spanish vocabulary. (It’s true I’ve been living in Spain for almost 20 years but this trick was a turning point!)
I love your blog by the way! Always fascinating stuff!
Seems like another argument in favor of so-called “Quiz and recall” method when you take notes with a goal of testing yourself in the future on the material.
I would hardly call it a “simple trick” 😉 More like “work hard if you want to remember the material properly”.