After amputation, many people feel ‘phantom limb‘ sensations that seem to come from the missing body part. Although typically associated with missing arms or legs, these phantom sensations can arise from almost anywhere and a new study in the Journal of the History of the Neurosciences looks at how the ‘phantom penis’ has enjoyed a surprisingly long history in the medical literature.
The first case of a phantom penis was mentioned in passing by the ‘father’ of phantom limbs, Silas Weir Mitchell, and there has been an assumption that these sensations are rare or unusual.
In fact, a 1999 case report of a phantom penis after amputation noted only a few previous mentions of the experience, some of which have become quite well-known.
Among the most cited publications is one by Boston surgeon A. Price Heusner (1950) containing two case studies. His first case was an elderly man whose penis was “accidently traumatized and amputated,” and who “was intermittently aware of a painless but always erect penile ghost whose appearances were neither provoked nor provokable by sexual phantasies” (Heusner, 1950, p. 129). This man had to look under his clothes to be sure that his penis was, in fact, absent. Heusner’s second case was a middle-aged, perineal cancer patient. Because his malignancy had spread and was causing intense burning pains in his groin, he opted to undergo penile amputation. Thereafter, he continued to have painful sensations “suggesting the continuing presence of the penis,” until he underwent spinal surgery
This new historical study shows that there were actually many reports of phantom penises in the 18th Century medical literature that have previously been overlooked.
These include reports from some of the most important doctors of the time, and indeed, some of the most important in history.
This included the Scottish surgeon and anatomist John Hunter who reported on what can only be described as phantom wanking:
A serjeant of marines who had lost the glans, and the greater body of the penis, upon being asked, if he ever felt those sensations which are peculiar to the glans, declared, that upon rubbing the end of the stump, it gave him exactly the sensation which friction upon the glans produced, and was followed by an emission of the semen.
Hunter’s case highlights an interesting aspect of the phantom penis sensation which seems to differentiate it from most other forms of phantom limb sensations – they tend to be pleasurable rather than painful.
Phantom limbs are often associated with the feeling that the missing body part is stuck in an awkward position, such as the ‘fingers digging into the palm’, something which the mirror box treatment attempts to correct.
Although some painful phantom penises have been reported they seem more likely to appear as pleasurable sensations and phantom erections.
This may have some interesting implications for neuroscience. Phantom limbs are thought to arise when activity in the brain maps that represent the limbs no longer have a constant flow of sensory feedback that keep them tied to their task.
The boundaries of the maps become blurry and information from other body areas starts to cause activity in the map for the missing limb, leading to the phantom sensations.
However, in contrast to the penis, arms and legs involve much more of a feedback loop, because fine action control signals are being sent and modified on the basis of the sensations from the limb.
As the penis has less need for such fine action control, it’s probably less likely that misfiring of the signals can make it seem as if it is in an awkward or painful position, possibly reducing the chance of an uncomfortable phantom pecker.
19 thoughts on “A history of the phantom penis”
If I lose one penis will I still have wet dreams?
Any information from the old, drastic castration practices for eunuch-production?
Would be also interesting to hear if transsexual women ever experience a phantom penis.
Most Transsexual Men (female to male transsexuals) report having phantom penises.
Yes on occasion, very disturbing it is too
Yes, sometimes. I’ve read a study (I don’t have the link with me) that found that it was rarer than in cisgender men who’d had penile amputation.
Many trans women have reported phantom breasts and/or phantom vulvas, and, as HMJ above said, many trans men have reported phantom penes as well.
Admittedly I am not transsexual but a biowoman with fluid gender.
However, I have been and autoandrophile (a female who is sexually aroused by the thought of having a masculine body) since childhood.
I found this page because I do feel the presence of phantom male anatomy…almost exclusively when sexually excited.
It is interesting to speculate then whether castration of sexual predators would be effective for preventing further abuse if a phantom penis could rise up and require action.
I don’t think castration of sexual criminals actually means cutting off the penis. Wikipedia says: “Castration… is any action, surgical, chemical, or otherwise, by which a male loses the functions of the testicles or a female loses the functions of the ovaries.
Transsexual gender realignment surgery does not involve removal of the penis but penile inversion. The skin and nerve endings are all still present but put to a different use. It’s highly unlikely that phantom limb sensations will occur from material that is for the most part still present in the body and receiving sensation.
Some (but by no means all) M2F trans women definitely report a ‘phantom’ penis sensation. I’ve been involved in support work with the M2F community for almost twenty years and I’ve seen it repeatedly, although I’ve not kept records. Perhaps I should have. It’s quite distressing for some trans women, because although the body may have been modified, to suddenly get the sensation that everything is back where it was can be very frightening until they check everything is where it should be – at least one was briefly convinced there had been some devastating surgical failure. It’s necessary to relearn the relationship between sensation and the area it comes from, and even then, the amount of sensation retained depends entirely on the method used in the reconstruction and the skill of the surgeon. For those who are left with little sensation, phantom penis would not be at all surprising.