Psychologists have often wondered whether attention and consciousness are the same thing. Can we only be conscious of things we pay attention to? And can we attend to things we’re not conscious of?
A paper [pdf] published last year suggests that they are, in fact, separate mental processes.
William James, one of the founder of modern psychology, wrote that “everyone knows what attention is” when trying to define it.
Similarly, as neuroscientist Susan Greenfield has pointed out, scientists often rely on a ‘we all know what we’re talking about, don’t we?’ definition of consciousness.
It turns out that attention is easier to define that consciousness, and in psychology it generally refers to the preferential processing of one source of information over another.
This can be measured experimentally because it’s possible to see how experience of one thing affects performance on another task, even if the person isn’t aware of experiencing anything in the first place.
We described an example of this last week, in a study that found that people could make accurate beauty judgements for faces presented so quickly they didn’t consciously recognise them.
This study, and many others on ‘implicit’ or ‘subliminal’ perception, demonstrate that people can attend to something without being conscious of it.
Being conscious of something we haven’t attended to, and where attention is nearly absent, is a bit more tricky.
The paper, by cognitive scientists Christof Koch and Naotsugu Tsuchiya, suggests that getting ‘gist’ impressions might be one example.
Experiments show that when photographs are unexpectedly flashed up in front of participants for no more than 30ms, they don’t have time to focus on any part of it, but can report a general gist or summary of the image.
Consciousness and attention have also been shown to have opposite effects in some instances.
When participants try to find two embedded images within a rapidly flashed stream of pictures, they often fail to see the second image – an effect known as ‘attentional blink‘.
However, one study [pdf] found that distracting people during this task, actually made them better at it, they were more likely to consciously detect the second image.
Reducing their attention to the task seemed to increase their conscious awareness.
The Koch and Tsuchiya paper has many more examples if you’re interested in trying to untangle these closely related processes.
pdf of ‘Attention and Consciousness: Two Distinct Brain Processes’ (via SciCon).
4 thoughts on “Are attention and consciousness the same thing?”
It’s an old problem I think. We have a quite accurate idea about what attention is, but consciousness is a more complex concept. Perhaps, we should blame ourselves, because we use this word oftenly in very different meanings and contexts.
A few months back there was a paper out about how meditation can increase performance on the attentional blink task, a lot of popular press accounts of the paper suggested that this implies meditation can increase attention, but given the finding of the paper you cite here, isn’t it equally likely the opposite could be true, meditation makes you less attentive?
Is there anyway I can see this test and see if I can see the second image.
This is an attentional blink test.