How culture can invert genetic risk

Neuron Culture has a fantastic piece on how a long touted ‘depression gene’ turned out to reduce the risk of mood problems in people in East Asians and why we can’t always understand genetic effects on behaviour without understanding culture.

The piece riffs on the long-established finding that the short variant of the serotonin transporter or 5-HTTLPR gene is more common in people with depression, until psychologist Joan Chiao found that East Asians are more than twice as likely to have the gene but only have half the rate of mood problems.

Why is this the case? Probably because 5-HTTLPR isn’t so much a gene for depression, but more likely for social sensitivity, and East Asian culture is more likely to be collectivist, where social connections matter more in your psychological make-up:

So how does individualism-v-collectivism relate to depression and depression genes? Here Chiao and Blizinsky, as well as Way and Lieberman (these connections were apparently ripe) turned to another emerging idea: That the short SERT gene seems to sensitize people not just to bad experience, but to all experience, good or bad…

This starts to explain the purported interplay of the S/S allele and a collectivist culture: If short-SERT people get more out of social support, a more supportive culture could buffer them against depression, easing any selective pressure against the gene. Meanwhile the gene’s growing prevalence would make the culture increasingly supportive, since those who carry it might be more empathetic. Studies have shown, for instance, that short-SERT people more readily recognize and react to others’ emotional states.

For those who keep an eye on such things, Neuron Culture has just become part of the newly launched Wired Science blog network which is already full of great stuff.
 

Link to Neuron Culture on ‘The Depression Map’.

2 Comments

  1. Posted September 15, 2010 at 6:45 am | Permalink

    Firstly, I’m wondering why a picture of an East Asian dragon is essential for this post.

    Secondly, how do you back your outright assertion that “East Asian culture is more likely to be collectivist”? Doesn’t quite seem like a scientific claim to me. In fact, it seems like a dangerous patch to a contradiction made by poorly conducted science to begin with.

  2. Posted September 15, 2010 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    The Chinese dragon is because while dragons are generally considered to be dangerous in Western cultures, they are considered to be a symbol of strength and good luck in China, which I thought was nice analogy for the effect of the 5-HTTLPR gene.

    As the article notes, there is a large amount of research that suggests Asian cultures are more collectivist, although there are some important caveats (nicely written up in this NewSci article).


4 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] How culture can invert genetic risk “Neuron Culture has a fantastic piece on how a long touted ‘depression gene’ turned out [...]

  2. [...] the gene and affective problems has been long established, but recently it was pointed out that the presence of this marker was twice as high in East Asian populations but the frequency of the com…. It has been speculated that the gene does not relate to depression or other psychological [...]

  3. [...] How culture can invert genetic risk | Mind Hacks Neuron Culture has a fantastic piece on how a long touted ‘depression gene’ turned out to reduce the risk of mood problems in people in East Asians and why we can’t always understand genetic effects on behaviour without understanding culture. [...]

  4. [...] A summary by Mind Hacks [...]

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 23,875 other followers