Eric Kandel’s reasons to be cheerful

Nobel prize-winning neuroscientist Eric Kandel has been asked to describe four advances in neuroscience from the past year that inspire optimism in an article for Edge.

His choices demonstrate an eclectic interest in modern mind and brain science.

The first is the discovery that MicroRNA is involved in synaptic connections and the second is advances in the understanding of how the hippocampus might store spatial information.

Kandel’s third choice is the discovery that single genes might lead to quite profound changes in social behaviour.

Perhaps his fourth choice is the most interesting, however. He cites neuroscientific evidence for the effectiveness of psychotherapy in treating mental illness, particularly for a type of therapy called cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT.

CBT is the most comprehensively researched of all the psychotherapies.

It has been shown to be as effective, if not more effective, than medication for anxiety and depressive disorders in randomised controlled trials, although best results are usually reported when both medication and CBT are combined, particularly in moderate or severe cases.

Recently, researchers have started to use brain scanning techniques to see how the function of the brain changes after CBT treatment.

Link to Kandel’s article ‘A Neuroscience Sampling’ from Edge.

Mind and brain podcast guide

The BPS Research Digest has just published a comprehensive list of psychology and neuroscience podcasts available for your listening pleasure.

It’s been put together by the BPSRD editor (our very own Dr Christian Jarrett) and is a fantastic guide to the best in mind and brain audio.

It includes podcasts from universities, scientific journals and professionals in the field and includes everything from serious analysis to lighthearted discussion.

Link to BPSRD article ‘Psychology podcasts: a clickable list’.

Five minutes with Gretchen Rubin

Gretchen Rubin is a lawyer-turned-author who’s now pursuing happiness, by test-driving every principle, tip, theory, and scientific study she can find on the subject, and writing a book about her experiences as she goes.

Sources of inspiration stretch from Aristotle to Oprah Winfrey, and her quest is being charted on her blog, the Happiness Project.

Her online journal has recently explored how happiness relates to physical attractiveness, whether children makes us content, and what Voltaire has to say about living a good life – among a bewildering array of other investigations.

As well as experimenting with her life and recording the results, Gretchen has also been kind enough to talk to Mind Hacks about her motivations and discoveries.

Continue reading “Five minutes with Gretchen Rubin”

A critical view of transhumanism

ABC Radio’s All in the Mind just had an edition on transhumanism, where evolutionary psychologist Prof Leda Cosmides gives a critical commentary on the movement which seeks to to extend human abilities and lifespan through technology.

The programme is particularly interesting, as transhumanism is still on the scientific fringe, and it’s rare to see one of the scientific mainstream make a serious attempt at a critique.

Cosmides takes the movement to task for what she sees as an oversimplification of psychology to fit with technological developments, and a naivety in assuming that human instincts can be engineered without wider consequences.

If you want more of a background to transhumanism, George Dvorsky recently published a transhumanist dictionary, as we reported recently on Mind Hacks.

Link to All in the Mind on ‘Prospects for a Transhuman mind?’.

Neuroscience, know thyself

The New English Review has a thought-provoking article by Theodore Dalrymple (the pen name of psychiatrist Anthony Daniels) who argues that modern neuroscience will not be able to provide a perfect self-understanding, and even if it could, disaster would follow.

Dalrymple is an interesting character, as he’s one of the few conservative writers in the area of mind, brain and mental health who has both experience of working in psychiatry across the world, and a vast academic knowledge.

His writing is distinctly against the mainstream of much modern medicine, particularly in the field of addiction, which, he argues, is often explained by social factors that minimise personal responsibility and disempower the patient.

In this article, Dalrymple argues against the enthusiasm for neuroscience as the ‘great new hope’ which has captured popular imagination in recent decades.

Those who say that we are on the verge of a huge increase in self-understanding are claiming that enlightenment will suddenly be reached under the scientific bo tree. The enlightenment will have to be sudden rather than gradual because, if it were gradual, we should already be able to point to an increase in human contentment and self-control brought about by our already increased knowledge. But even the most advanced societies are just as full of angst, or poor impulse control, of existential bewilderment, of adherence to clearly irrational doctrines, as ever they were. There is no sign that, Prozac and neurosurgery notwithstanding, any of this is about to change fundamentally.

Link to article ‘Do the Impossible: Know Thyself’ (thanks Karel!)

AI system cited for unlicensed practice of law

The robot rebellion got a step closer this week as a US court cited a web-based artificial intelligence system for practising law without a license.

The website provided legal advice based on an expert system – a database of knowledge that is often structured by the links and associations made by human experts in the field.

Someone obviously took exception to a programme providing legal advice and the issue ended up in litigation.

The Wired Blog reported on the curious case and linked to the pdf of the court ruling that stated:

[The] system touted its offering of legal advice and projected an aura of expertise concerning bankruptcy petitions; and, in that context, it offered personalized — albeit automated — counsel. … We find that because this was the conduct of a non-attorney, it constituted the unauthorized practice of law.

I’ll be looking out for more signs that Skynet is becoming self-aware and will be heading for the bunkers at the earliest sign of impending nuclear war.

Link to Wired Blog on ‘AI Cited for Unlicensed Practice of Law’.

2007-03-09 Spike activity

Quick links from the past week in mind and brain news:

Prof Philip Zimbardo, of ‘Stanford Prison Experiment‘ fame, slams the US Government and the Abu Ghraib scandal in his outgoing speech.

Developing Intelligence examines the possible role of dopamine in the binding problem and consciousness.

How I tamed the voices in my head – a fantastic story in the Independent about hearing and dealing with voices.

An amazing demo of what we remember visually, and why is put online by Cognitive Daily.

The BBC reports that the use of hyperactivity drugs for children soars worldwide.

Neurontic ponders why we have a nervous system in our stomachs.

Is Your Memory Erased While You Sleep? asks Scientific American.

OmniBrain discovers that a court ruled that a bankruptcy website passed the Turing test.

Compulsive hoarding in the digital age. A curious form of psychopathology sees its expression in collections of digital media.

Neurophilosopher looks at a brainwave-reading video game controller!

An ethical code to prevent humans abusing robots, and vice versa, is being drawn up by South Korea.

Nature reports on research suggesting biblical accounts of violence can spark actual aggression, particularly in believers.

Sex doesn’t sell, particularly for women, according to research discussed in the Economist.

Near death experiences linked to sleep anomalies

Neurologist Prof Kevin Nelson and colleagues have just published a study in the journal Neurology showing that out-of-body experiences and near death experiences are more likely to occur in people who have unusual experiences when falling asleep or waking.

Science Daily reports that:

They found that an out-of-body experience is statistically as likely to occur during a near death experience as it is to occur during the transition between wakefulness and sleep. Nelson suggests that phenomena in the brain’s arousal system, which regulates different states of consciousness including REM sleep and wakefulness, may be the cause for these types of out-of-body displays.

Hallucinations and free-form ideas are very common in the period of entering sleep (called the hypnagogic state) and the period of waking (called the hypnopompic state).

Artists and visionaries throughout history have found inspiration from these unusual sleep-related experiences, as recounted in a recent Fortean Times article.

Link to coverage from Science Daily.
Link to coverage from the Daily Telegraph.
Link to PubMed entry for scientific paper.

The cognitive evolution of good and evil

This week’s New Scientist podcast is a special edition entirely dedicated to an interview with psychologist Prof Marc Hauser who specialises in understanding the evolutionary psychology of moral judgements.

Hauser has been the subject of much popular interest since the publication of his book Moral Minds (ISBN 0316728152) which argues that we have an innate ‘moral grammar’ that promotes moral decision making and a sense of justice.

It’s a bold and controversial argument, not least because it argues for inherited psychological concepts (almost always controversial), but also because it extends the idea of what could be inherited to new territory.

On a related note, if you catch the print edition of the magazine, it has an interview with Douglas Hofstadter who discusses his theories about the self.

This is based on ideas from Hofstadter’s forthcoming book, with the wonderful title I Am a Strange Loop.

Link to NewSci podcast page.
mp3 of NewSci interview with Marc Hauser.

Deep brain electrodes – from the inside

Wired magazine has a fascinating feature article about an operation to implant deep brain stimulation electrodes in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. Crucially, the article is written the patient himself.

Deep brain stimulation involves inserting permanent electrodes into the brain to pump tiny pulses of electricity into key areas.

It’s most commonly used as a treatment for Parkinson’s disease which causes problems with the ‘motor loop’ – a network of brain areas that control movement (actually there are two main ones, the direct and indirect).

This is why patients with Parkinson’s disease have trouble moving and have a visible tremor.

The loops consist of a series of areas that might boost activity or reduce activity in subsequent parts of the loop.

Damage to any of these areas might mean that the following area might not get enough activation (like with a faulty accelerator), or might be too active because it is not being damped down correctly (like with a faulty brake).

Neurosurgeons can try and restore balance in this loop by either damping down an area by surgery (e.g. a pallidotomy) or by increasing activation at an area by deep brain stimulation.

This is exactly the treatment that Steven Guile, the author of the Wired article, describes.

I’ll be kept awake for the entire procedure. During the surgery I will talk and move my limbs on command, which helps Team Hubris know which part of my brain is being poked.

Unfortunately, this also means I’m conscious when [neurosurgeon] Henderson produces what looks like a hand drill and uses it to burr two dime-sized holes into the top of my skull. It doesn’t hurt, but it’s loud.

Team Hubris is installing a deep brain stimulator, essentially a neurological pacemaker, in my head. This involves threading two sets of stiff wires in through my scalp, through my cerebrum ‚Äî most of my brain ‚Äî and into my subthalamic nucleus, a target the size of a lima bean, located near the brain stem. Each wire is a little thinner than a small, unfolded paper clip, with four electrodes at one end. The electrodes will eventually deliver small shocks to my STN. How did I get into this mess? Well, I have Parkinson’s disease. If the surgery works, these wires will continually stimulate my brain in an attempt to relieve my symptoms.

The article is a wonderful tale of neurosurgery from the inside and a great guide to some of the science and medicine of the condition.

There’s also a fantastic a video segment where Gulie narrates and explains the operation.

Link to Wired article ‘A Shock to the System’ (via Neurophilosopher).

All in the Mind on the Zyprexa saga

ABC Radio’s All in the Mind has broadcast a special on the legal case and previously secret Eli Lilly documents that just came to light on antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, also known as olanzapine, one of the most profitable drugs in the world.

We’ve been keeping track of the story here at Mind Hacks, as it was first picked up by The New York Times and disseminated across the world.

A lot of the digging on the story has been done by investigative journalist Philip Dawdy who has been publishing his revelations on mental health blog Furious Seasons.

He also published copies of the previously secret Eli Lilly documents that seem to suggest that the drug company tried to promote olanzapine inappropriately and obscure information about the drugs negative health effects.

As well as covering the accusations and revelation, All in the Mind also gets Eli Lilly’s response, who have categorically denied any wrong-doing and give a spirited defence on the programme.

Link to AITM on ‘The Zyprexa story’.

Memory and the parietal lobe

Science and Consciousness Review has a new feature article by staff writer Alice Kim discussing the role of the parietal lobe in memory.

The parietal lobe is typically linked to the representation of the body, and space in relation to the body, so it might be surprising that this area is being linked to more general memory abilities.

There is now a growing body of evidence for the importance of parietal areas in remembering and the article takes an in-depth look at what the scientific studies are telling us about how it all fits together.

Presumably, the author is not the same Alice Kim who is married to Nicolas Cage, but you can never be too sure.

Link to SCR article ‘The potential role of the parietal lobe in episodic memory and other cognitive functions’.

The E Generation at 40

BBC Radio 4 recently broadcast a documentary on the long-term effects of ecstasy (MDMA) now that the ‘E Generation’ are in their 40s.

The documentary looks at the evidence for long-term effects of ecstasy and dispels some of the myths that were promoted in anti-ecstasy campaigns of the early 90s (for example, the famously flawed brain scans presented to suggest that ecstasy leaves functional ‘holes’ in the brain).

It is clear that such scare stories about the drug’s damaging effects were greatly exaggerated.

The evidence does suggest, however, that heavy and / or long-term ecstasy use does lead to mild to moderate cognitive impairment in some people (memory seems particularly sensitive to change).

There is still a need for much more systematic research in this area, particularly as the evidence on whether these long-term impairments get better is quite mixed.

The programme is presented by Dr John Marsden who has researched the impact and neuroscience of ecstasy and talks to a number of people who were heavy ecstasy users in the past.

Link to ‘The E Generation at 40’ with audio.

Wired on independent neuroscientist Jeff Hawkins

The latest edition of Wired magazine has an article on technology pioneer turned neuroscientist Jeff Hawkins, who is attempting to develop and research a novel way of understanding how the brain learns.

Hawkins is best known for inventing the Palm Pilot and Treo hand held computers, but has now focused his efforts on a long-time interest, neuroscience.

He has founded the Redwood Neuroscience Institute that develops computational models of neurobiology and has recently launched an artificial intelligence company Numenta.

Hawkins’ big break into the world of cognitive science came with his book On Intelligence (ISBN 0805078533) where he set out his original and somewhat grand theory of brain function, the ‘memory prediction framework’.

As an independent researcher in the field, he’s gone for quite a different approach from mainstream neuroscience, not least by attempting to develop a theory that aims to explain a major function of the brain in one go.

I must admit, I’ve got a great admiration for independent cognitive science researchers. Steve Grand is another self-taught original thinker (and well worth hearing speak if you get the chance).

The Wired article look both at Hawkins’ theories, and his journey from Silicon Valley engineer to independent mind and brain researcher.

UPDATE: The webpage of Numenta has just been updated with details of the application based on Hawkin’s research on the brain – Thanks Marcos!

Link to Wired article on Jeff Hawkins.

Patricia Churchland – mind, body and brain

Neurophilosopher Patricia Churchland is interviewed on ABC Radio’s In Conversation where she talks about her work on understanding how our concepts of the mind can map on to the developing field of neuroscience.

Churchland is particulary known for eliminative materialism, which argues that our everyday understanding of the mind is generally false and won’t ever map onto the brain as neuroscience understands it.

It’s been a powerful, influential but controversial argument in cognitive science.

I mean my idea was something like this: consider the follow analogies. Suppose that you were in a time capsule and you were able to go back to, let’s say the 12th century, and say to a monk who was puzzling deeply about the nature of fire. And you said to him, Look, let me tell you what it is; it’s rapid oxidation and you would go on to talk about how exactly that occurred. Now the thing about it is that, since he does not even know about elements, he still thinks there’s just earth, air, fire and water, it isn’t going to make much sense to him. So you’ve given an answer, but lacking the surrounding theoretical context it would be very hard for him to make sense of it.

And my point about the brain now is that if I were given, in an analogous way, the answer to what it is that makes for conscious states in the brain, given that how much we don’t know about fundamentals in neuroscience, I would likely not be able to make sense of the answer.

Link to In Conversation with Patricia Churchland.