An online museum of mental health and turmoil

The UK’s Science Museum has a special online exhibit about the history of mental health and illness that is packed full of fascinating photos and stories.

This rather unpleasant photo from the ‘mental institutions’ section particularly caught my eye. It is labelled “Elderly man in restraint chair, from a series of photographs taken of patients at West Riding Lunatic Asylum, Yorkshire, c. 1869.”

It’s interesting because it bears an interesting resemblance to a famous picture of James Norris, an ‘insane’ US marine who was found by the press to be permanently restrained in Bethlem Royal Hospital (the ‘Bedlam’ asylum) in 1814.

His condition so outraged the public that it was instrumental in a number of reforms to ‘madhouses’ including the 1828 Madhouses Act and the 1845 Lunacy Act.

However, the photo of the elderly gentleman is dated 1869, after both reforms, suggesting that this was either a temporary measure to restrain ‘unruly’ patients, or that the London-centric reforms just didn’t have much effect in the distant provinces of the United Kingdom.

On an unrelated point, the man is described as being a patient at ‘West Riding Lunatic Asylum’ the short name of the ‘West Riding Pauper Lunatic Asylum’.

British rock band Kasabian recently named their award winning album after the hospital but managed to mangle the name, entitling it ‘West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum’.

Link to Science Museum mental health exhibit (via BPSRD).

It’s hot in here

The Neuroskeptic blog has done a fantastic analysis of the popularity of different areas of the brain among neuroscientists by looking at how many scientific papers have been published on them since 1985. It’s like Vogue magazine’s hot styles, but for neurobiology.

I’ll leave you to check out the wonderful graphs, but here’s the punchline.

“The orbitofrontal cortex and cingulate cortex are both undergoing massive growth at the moment. The amygdala and parietal cortex are pretty hot too. By contrast, the cerebellum and the caudate are stuck in the scientific doldrums.”

The cerebellum has more neurons than the whole of the rest of the brain put together but we still don’t understand it very well. Not least because damage to the area doesn’t seem to produce some of the striking selective impairments in our abilities as does damage to other brain areas.

Consequently, the traditional way to annoy anyone doing a talk on their brain scanning experiment is to ask what the activity in the cerebellum means.

Link to Neuroskeptic on ‘This Season’s Hottest Brain Regions’.

Gilles de la Tourette’s strange story

As well being one of the most influential neurologists in the history of medicine, Georges Gilles de la Tourette, led a very colourful life.

The journal Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery has an engaging article about his work on hypnotism and how he became involved in a debate over the possible criminal uses of hypnotism.

At one point, he took part in a celebrated trial where a murderer claimed she had been hypnotised to commit the crime, but most strikingly Gilles de la Tourette was shot in the head by a likely-psychotic patient who claimed he was ‘hypnotising her from a distance’.

The event was so striking it made the front page Le Pays Illustré.

On 6 December, 1893, at 18:45, at Gilles de la Tourette’s domicile, 39 rue de l‚ÄôUniversit√©, a young woman asked for him, and since he was not back from the hospital, she said she would wait for him. When he arrived fifteen minutes later, she immediately followed him and told that she had been hypnotized many times, being now without resources and asking for 50 francs. He vaguely remembered to have seen her (and indeed she had participated to several hypnotism sessions), and told her to give her name and address. Since she asked for money again, he went to the door, when he heard a shot and felt a violent shock in the back of the head.

Two new shots followed, but he could leave the room, feeling blood pouring down to his neck. This story was shortly reported in Le Progr√®s M√©dical by Georges Guinon, who arrived a few minutes later, and saw the woman quietly sitting in the waiting room, apparently satisfied. Guinon’s article was published with the purpose to stop the already spreading rumors of an assault perpetrated under hypnosis, since this would have been a major challenge to the La Salp√™tri√®re school theories that no crime could ever be accomplished during a hypnotic state.

The wound was not severe, and the same evening, Gilles de la Tourette was able to write to his friend the journalist Georges Montorgueil: “What a strange story”. Previous mentions of the event inaccurately reported that it led to a famous trial, while there was no trial at all. The woman, named Rose Kamper (born Lecoq, on 23 June, 1864, in Poissy) indeed was recognized to be insane. She had already spent time at the Sainte-Anne asylum, and was known to have written threatening letters to the administrator of the École Polytechnique Mr. Rochas. She later told that she suspected Gilles de la Tourette to be in love with her, but also that she had been hypnotized without her consent, with the consequence that her will had been annihilated.

She reported that she had been hypnotized “at distance”, and that there was another person in her, who had pushed her to shoot. She was examined by Brouardel, Ballet and Jules Falret, who concluded to what nowadays corresponds to paranoid schizophrenia, so that she was sent back to Sainte-Anne and other hospitals, from which she was intermittently released. Interestingly enough, a couple of days before the assassination attempt, Gilles de la Tourette and Montorgueil had published an article in L’Éclair on hypnotism contesting the Nancy school.

Gilles de la Tourette lived on for more than a decade after being shot although towards the end of the century his behaviour started to become a little bizarre.

In 1899 he published a famous article on recognising and treating the neurological effects of syphilis but when writing the paper he noticed the symptoms in himself, realised he had neurosyphilis and became profoundly depressed.

He was forced to leave his job in 1901 owing to his increasingly delusional behaviour and was admitted to the Lausanne Psychiatric Hospital in Switzerland when he eventually died in 1904.

Link to PubMed entry for article on Gilles de la Tourette.

The moral intuitions of babies

Photo by Flickr user gabi_menashe. Click for sourceThe New York Times has a fascinating article by psychologist Paul Bloom on how babies may have a far more developed sense of justice and moral behaviour than we assume.

The piece starts by discussing the difficulties of doing psychology experiments on babies and goes on to explain how these problems have been overcome in the lab.

It then focuses on some of the work arising from Bloom’s own lab where they’ve sought to understand whether very young children, even those who are only a few months old, can make moral distinctions based on behaviour. Surprisingly, it seems they can.

To increase our confidence that the babies we studied were really responding to niceness and naughtiness, Karen Wynn and Kiley Hamlin, in a separate series of studies, created different sets of one-act morality plays to show the babies. In one, an individual struggled to open a box; the lid would be partly opened but then fall back down. Then, on alternating trials, one puppet would grab the lid and open it all the way, and another puppet would jump on the box and slam it shut. In another study (the one I mentioned at the beginning of this article), a puppet would play with a ball. The puppet would roll the ball to another puppet, who would roll it back, and the first puppet would roll the ball to a different puppet who would run away with it. In both studies, 5-month-olds preferred the good guy — the one who helped to open the box; the one who rolled the ball back — to the bad guy. This all suggests that the babies we studied have a general appreciation of good and bad behavior, one that spans a range of actions.

Link to NYT piece ‘The Moral Life of Babies’.

fMRI lie detection and the Wonder Woman problem

Wired Science has covered a legal case where fMRI brain scan ‘lie detection’ data was offered as evidence. While the lawyer was initially hopeful, it was ruled inadmissible by the judge on the basis that judgements of witness credibility by the jury should be based on their impression of the witness.

It not clear from the reports exactly why fMRI evidence should not, in principal, contribute to the jury’s judgement of witness credibility along with other evidence, but arguments usually centre on the reliability of the technology based on an evaluation known as the Frye or Daubert test which assesses whether the technology is ‘generally accepted’ by the scientific community.

The tests are essentially the same and the basis of both is the 1923 Frye vs United States court case which involved, interestingly enough, an unsuccessful attempt to admit evidence from an early lie detector that used a measure of blood pressure.

Even more interestingly, the inventor of the ‘lie detector’ in this case was psychologist William Moulton Marston who is more famous as being the creator of Wonder Woman. It is no coincidence that the female super hero has a Lasso of Truth that wraps around the body and compels the person not to lie.

Marston’s device was the forerunner of the polygraph test which is only admissible in some state courts in the USA and generally falls foul of the Frye and Daubert ‘general acceptance’ criteria.

fMRI lie detection also fails to make this grade. Although studies have found that in some instances the technique can detect lies better than chance, the experiments have produced variable results, using situations that aren’t necessarily good matches to everyday situations (such as asking participants to lie about a playing card they saw) and have led some neuroscientsts to call for a suspension of its use.

However, the issue is not as clear cut as it seems and Frederick Schauer from the University of Virginia School of Law makes a convincing case in an upcoming article for the Cornell Law Review that scientific standards of evidence should not be applied wholesale to courts of law.

Most of the arguments from neuroscientists focus on the scenario where someone ‘might be sent to prison’ on the basis of fMRI evidence, but Schauer notes that this is only a tiny proportion of court cases and that evidence should be evaluated depending on the context.

Schauer argues that if the decision was genuinely about sending someone to prison the highest standards of reliability must apply, but lawyers regularly introduce less reliable evidence as part of a bigger picture.

For example, when a lawyer says ‘would an upstanding community man like this really be likely to kill his business partner?’ everyone accepts that this is not a highly reliable guide to whether someone is a murderer but as part of a collection of evidence it might help show that the prosecution cannot prove ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that the accused is guilty. Numerous other types of similarly weak circumstantial evidence might also be presented.

This, Schauer says, could be where technology like fMRI lie detection could play a part. If it is 60% reliable and is simply a small part of a larger picture it seems daft to not allow it when similarly ‘unreliable’ evidence is admitted all the time. As he notes “Although slight evidence ought not to be good enough for scientists, it is a large part of the law.”

Furthermore, in civil cases the burden of proof is different and cases may be decided ‘on the balance of probabilities’ rather than the more stringent ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. Additionally, lawyers may want to submit fMRI evidence not as evidence for deciding the case but as evidence for awarding damages.

In these cases, Schauer argues that applying the standards of science to legal cases without judging the context would be as bad as applying legal standards to science – like trying to decide a scientific question by inviting two people with opposing views and deciding who seems more credible.

The commercial fMRI lie-detector companies are currently trying as hard as they can to get the first evidence from their not very effective technology accepted in a court case. Eventually, it will probably happen but likely on some minor point in the bigger picture.

When it happens it will be widely hyped and the danger will be not that such evidence is allowed, but that it will be over-interpreted and misunderstood, in the same way that other scientific evidence is widely misinterpreted.

Indeed, if we needed warning about the dangers of this, it was illustrated by a recent case in India where unproven EEG ‘lie detection’ technology was accepted as key evidence in the conviction of a woman for murder.

Link to Wired Science to attempt to admit fMRI lie detection.
Link to Wired science on the evidence being rejected.

The slow disappearance of Agatha Christie

RadioLab discusses how the final novels of Agatha Christie subtly reflected the early stages of dementia as her written vocabulary and her ability to use the nuances of language slowly began to diminish.

The discussion is based on a linguistic analysis of her books by English professor Ian Lancashire who found in his study [pdf] that the range of vocabulary in her final works markedly declined and her use of indefinite words (like ‘something’ or ‘anything’) greatly increased, indicating that her striking ability to manipulate the English language was fading as she began to develop dementia.

This is not the first analysis that has looked at the literary output of a great author as she declined. A 2005 study analysed the text of three Iris Murdoch books, who famously lost her literary abilities as Alzheimer’s disease began to take hold, and found a similar pattern in her later writing.

In the case of Murdoch, and probably in the case of Christie, both of these analyses were on books completed before the authors were diagnosed with the condition (although we don’t know if Christie was ever formally diagnosed owing to the secrecy of her family).

In fact, we know that this is a common pattern, in that years before people get diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease there is a slow but steady decline of mental function that is a little beyond what we would expect from normal ageing but not so severe that it is clear the person has the condition.

The RadioLab programme also discusses the well-known ‘Nun Study‘ project which has studied the relationship between biological and life-style factors and the risk of getting Alzheimer’s disease in a group of nuns.

In one of the studies from the project, the researchers found a link between getting Alzheimer’s and the linguistic skills of the nuns that they demonstrated in an essay they wrote when they first entered the convent as young women – those who wrote the more complex essays were less likely to develop the dementia later in life.

This reflects an idea in dementia research known as the ‘cognitive reserve‘ which suggests that your mental ability is a bit like a fuel tank and when wear-and-tear on the brain drags your ability below a critical point in later life, you start going into the rapid decline of dementia.

Those with more mental ability are therefore more resistant (although not immune) to dementia. While level of education has been consistently linked to protection against dementia, it could just be that those who have more natural mental capacity study more, but there is some recent research that suggests education may help ‘top up’ the cognitive reserve fuel tank to help protect against the disease.

Link to RadioLab piece ‘Vanishing Words’.

Paradise learnt

The journal Memory has a remarkable case study of a man who began memorising the whole of John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost at the age of 58. The researchers tested him at age 74 and found they could pick any part of the 10,565 line poem and he could successfully remember the next 10 lines.

JB is an active, articulate septuagenarian who began memorising Paradise Lost at the age of 58 in 1993 as a form of mental activity to accompany his physical exercise at the gym. Although he had memorised various poems in earlier years, he never attempted anything of this magnitude. JB stated that he wanted to do something special to commemorate the then-upcoming millennium. ‚ÄúWhy not something really challenging like, oh, ‘Paradise Lost’?‚Äù he said. He began by walking on a treadmill one day while trying to memorise the opening lines of the poem. After those lines were committed to memory, he extended the task over successive sessions to see how far he could go. JB, who regards himself as a theatre person, reflected on this process this way:

“The real challenge was just not to memorise it, but to know it deeply enough to really tell Milton’s story. As I finished each book, I began to perform it and keep it alive in repertory while committing the next one to memory. ‚Ķ The goal eventually became not just a series of performances, but to do all twelve books on the same occasion.”

Nine years later, JB achieved his goal. He recited Paradise Lost in its entirety over a 3-day weekend. Since that 2001 performance JB has given numerous public recitations, although for many of these performances, due to the time it takes to recite the poem (approximately 3 hours for Books I and II), he limits his performance to several books, rather than all of the books in their entirety. Typically, he moves and expresses emotion during a performance to help signify changes in characters, and he gives copies of the poem to the audience so that they can follow his memorised recitation.

Psychologist John Seamon discovered JB after attending one of his performances where he recited the whole of Books I and II from memory.

Seamon and his team asked JB to take part in tests regarding the epic work where they cued him with two lines selected from anywhere in the poem and asked him to recall the following 10 lines. In one part they picked out lines as they went through the books in order, in another they just chose books at random.

He seemed to stumble on a couple of books when they were tackled sequentially, but generally his verbatim recall was generally above 90% and seemed more consistent when the books were picked out randomly. The team also video-taped one of his live performances and found his average accuracy was between 97% and 98%.

Although not formally tested, JB’s everyday memory is apparently normal for his age, with his exceptional memory for Milton’s poem apparently arising from his relentless practice and dedication.

This is a common pattern in mental practice or ‘brain training’ style scenarios where we get better at the tasks we repeat but that improvement doesn’t seem to carry over very effectively into other areas of mental life.

If you’re interested in seeing JB in action he has his own webpage, mentioned in the scientific article, where he advertises his performances and where you can watch video of him reciting the poem.

Link to PubMed entry for case study.
Link to JB’s website.

The ‘sound’ of the silent howl

Photo by Flickr user Tambako the Jaguar. Click for sourceNature Neuroscience has an intriguing fMRI brain scanning study where the researchers could work out what sort of silent video clip the volunteers were watching by observing activity in the part of their brains specialised for perceiving sound.

Although silent, the video clips were all chosen to ‘imply’ sound by depicting things such as a howling dog, a piano key being struck or coins being dropped into a drinking glass. This reliably caused activity in the auditory cortex as the brain ‘simulated’ likely sounds.

The researchers used an analysis technique called ‘multivariate pattern analysis’ that can pick out brain activity patterns associated with different types of experience.

In this study, the analysis was set up to work as a ‘classifier’ where the research team entered both the brain scanning data and what video clips the participants were viewing for part of the experiment, and the ‘classifier’ then tried to guess which types of picture were being viewed for the rest of the experiment just by using the brain scan patterns it had learnt earlier.

After being trained on a sample of the data, the ‘classifier’ could identify which type of silent clip (animal, musical instrument or object) the person was watching by analysing the pattern of activity in the auditory part of the brain.

This is a lovely demonstration of how the brain ‘simulates’ the type of neural activity that would normally be triggered by other senses to help flesh out what it is experiencing.

Perhaps the earliest demonstration of this was from several studies that reported activity in parts of the brain specialised for visual perception that was triggered when you try and picture objects in your imagination.

These visualisation studies are an example of where you are consciously trying to ‘simulate’ another sense through active imagination but, as this new study shows, this sensory ‘filling’ in by the brain also seems to happen automatically.

Studies on ‘implicit motion’ provide another demonstration of this. For example, being shown a still picture that implies movement (such as a ball being dropped) will cause activity in V5, an area specialised for motion perception.

Link to Nature Neuroscience study (seems to be open access).
Link to PubMed entry for same.

Every underdog has its day

Slate has an excellent article on why we have a tendency to root for the underdog. It’s a fascinating area because it involves the combination of our perception of fairness, our positive emotional reaction to winners and our biases about what sort of characteristics we think underdogs might have – all of which could be pulling us in different directions.

The article is packed full of relevant studies, but the idea that we consistently over-estimate the success of underdogs particularly caught my eye:

Researchers have found evidence for exactly this phenomenon‚Äîcalled the “favorite-long-shot bias”‚Äîat the horse track. One recent study [pdf] that compiled stats from some 6 million American horse races showed a steep drop-off in the return on winning bets, as the odds against those bets increased. In other words, bettors were throwing money at the underdogs and underbidding on the favorites. That’s not because we get some special pleasure from playing the ponies at 100-to-1, the authors argue. It’s because we tend to overestimate the long shots’ chances.

Link to Slate on ‘The Underdog Effect’ (via The Frontal Cortex).

Full disclosure: I’m an occasional writer for Slate and I consistently over-rate the chances of long-shots.

The civil rights psychosis

The latest All in the Mind from ABC Radio National has a fascinating discussion about how the definition of schizophrenia shifted throughout the 20th century in the USA as it morphed from being a disease of the withdrawn middle class female to being the affliction of the aggressive black man.

The program is an interview with psychiatrist Jonathan Metzl who discusses his new book The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease.

Unfortunately, discussions about mental illness and race can quickly starting going round in circles. As we’ve discussed previously, the fact that an ethnic minority has higher rates of mental illness, does not, in itself, provide strong evidence that the mental health system is racist – as this could easily be a reflection of poverty or immigration, both of which have been shown to have been linked to mental illness independently of the skin colour of the peoples concerned.

However, Metzl’s critique is somewhat more subtle and he suggests that in mid-20th century America there were attempts, implicit or otherwise, to pathologise the civil rights movement by shifting the diagnosis for certain conditions – most notably, schizophrenia.

In fact, in 1968, an article in the Archives of General Psychiatry even proposed what was called ‘protest psychosis’, “a special type of reactive psychosis” that affected “American Negroes” which was caused by “the stress of asserting civil rights in the United States”.

At the time, the excessive and ad hoc use of the diagnosis of schizophrenia in the USA led to the famous ‘US-UK Diagnostic Study‘ where the States was brought in line with the standards and definitions used in Europe.

By the way, if you’re a regular All in the Mind listener don’t miss the extra audio that turns up on the blog. Sadly, you can’t download the extra audio directly because it is embedded in a playing widget, but if you mouseover or ‘View source’ you can see the whole URL for the extra mp3s and download by pasting this into your browser.

Link to AITM on ‘protest psychosis’.

Take cover

The cover of the May edition of the neurology journal Brain is really quite lovely.

Each of the circles is an individual EEG brain map of people with movement problems associated with Fragile X syndrome. The signals are evoked in response to word repetition and each activity map has been drawn from a study published in the same edition.

Don’t be fooled be the fact that the circles make up a brain-like shape as a whole, they don’t represent individual points on a single brain, each of the maps has just been arranged in this way for artistic purposes.

The description rather charmingly says “The maps are rearranged into a familiar shape!” The clue is in the title I presume.

Often when I mention the journal to non-neuroscientists they chuckle as the name seems funny. I’m long past the point where it seems at all abnormal but, presumably, if I saw a plumbing magazine called ‘Pipe’ or a fishing magazine called ‘Rod’ I would find them equally amusing.

Link to cover info for May’s edition of Brain.

Saints of the underworld

National Geographic Magazine has a nuanced, tragic and colourful article about the growing numbers of unofficial saints in Mexico that are called on to protect against death in the increasingly turbulent cities, or have been created as revered patrons of the criminal underworld by gangs and drug traffickers.

“The emotional pressures, the tensions of living in a time of crisis lead people to look for symbolic figures that can help them face danger,” says Jos√© Luis Gonz√°lez, a professor at Mexico’s National School of Anthropology and History who specializes in popular religions. Among the helper figures are Afro-Cuban deities that have recently found their way to new shores and outlaws that have been transformed into miracle workers, like a mythical bandit from northern Mexico called Jes√∫s Malverde. There are even saints from the New Testament repurposed for achieving not salvation but success. In this expanding spiritual universe, the worship of a skeleton dressed in long robes and carrying a scythe‚ÄîLa Santa Muerte‚Äîis possibly the fastest growing and, at first glance at least, the most extravagant of the new cults. “If you look at it from the point of view of a country that over the last ten years has become dangerously familiar with death,” Gonz√°lez says, “you can see that this skeleton is a very concrete and clear symbolic reference to the current situation.”

There is an excellent Wikipedia page on La Santa Muerte if you want more background on the deathly figure.

The NeoGeo article also discusses Jes√∫s Malverde, the ‘narcosaint’ that we mentioned in a previous post, who has a remarkable following on YouTube with numerous digital tributes appearing on the site.

Also, don’t miss National Geographic’s striking photo gallery that accompanies the piece.

Link to National Geographic article ‘Troubled Spirits’ (via 3QD).
Link to National Geographic photo gallery for the article.

K-Space Division

This is an amazing summary of a study just published in the latest edition of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. I have no idea what it’s about but it helps if you read it in the voice of Dr Spock.

Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division.

Magn Reson Med. 2010 May;63(5):1292-304.

Wharton S, Sch√§fer A, Bowtell R.

[Captain] A method for calculating quantitative three-dimensional susceptibility maps from field measurements acquired using gradient echo imaging at high field is presented. This method is based on division of the three-dimensional Fourier transforms of high-pass-filtered field maps by a simple function that is the Fourier transform of the convolution kernel linking field and susceptibility, and uses k-space masking to avoid noise enhancement in regions where this function is small. Simulations were used to show that the method can be applied to data acquired from objects that are oriented at one angle or multiple angles with respect to the applied field and that the use of multiple orientations improves the quality of the calculated susceptibility maps. As part of this work, we developed an improved approach for high-pass filtering of field maps, based on using an arrangement of dipoles to model the fields generated by external structures. This approach was tested on simulated field maps from the substantia nigra and red nuclei. Susceptibility mapping was successfully applied to experimental measurements on a structured phantom and then used to make measurements of the susceptibility of the red nuclei and substantia nigra in healthy subjects at 3 and 7 T.

When I grow up, I want to be in k-space division just like my father, so I can avenge his death at the hands of the structured phantom.

Link to abstract on PubMed.

Centre of attraction

Women who have a smaller waist in relation to their hips tend to be perceived as more attractive. Some argue this is an evolutionary tendency, a desire for women who are perceived to be more fertile, while others suggest it is just a product of the media who, from porn to Prada, laud the image of small waisted women.

The New York Times covers a fascinating study which tested these ideas in an innovative way – by seeing whether blind men, who have avoided the body-shape bias of visual media, would also find women with a lower waist-to-hip ratio more attractive.

The study, currently in press for the journal Evolution and Human Behavior, was devised by researcher led by psychologist Johan Karremans who tested the idea by using adjustable mannequins.

The blind stood before them; they were told to touch the women, to focus their hands on the waists and hips. The breasts on both figures were the same, in case the men reached too high. The men extended their arms; they ran their hands over the region. Then they scored the attractiveness of the bodies. Karremans had a hunch, he told me, that their ratings wouldn’t match those of the sighted men he used as controls, half of them blindfolded so that they, too, would be judging by feel. It seemed likely, he said, that visual culture would play an overwhelming part in creating the outlines of lust. And though the blind had almost surely grown up hearing attractiveness described, perhaps even in terms of hourglass shapes, it was improbable, he writes in his forthcoming journal paper, that they had heard descriptions amounting to, “The more hourglass shaped, the more attractive,” which would be necessary to favor the curvier mannequin over the figure that was only somewhat less so.

But, with some statistically insignificant variation, the scores of the blind matched those of the sighted. Both groups preferred the more pronounced sweep from waist to hip.

How this preference comes about is another matter of course, and the scientific article apparently suggests that as body scent is also a guide to attractiveness and is partly genetically determined it’s possible that blind men have come to associate body shape with attractiveness via smell.

The explanation sounds a little speculative to me, but the core finding of the study is fascinating.

The NYT article is also a great brief guide to attractiveness and waist-to-hip ratio argument.

Link to NYT on ‘The Anatomy of Desire’.

2010-04-30 Spike activity

Quick links from the past week in mind and brain news:

You could not ask for a better combination. Coverage of the mirror movement mutation in a piece from Not Exactly Rocket Science and an article on Neurophilosophy.

The Independent covers the frankly mind-bending news that David Cronenberg is to make a film on the relationship between Freud and Jung with Keira Knightley playing Jung’s lover. I would have gone for Bruckheimer for director myself.

Fantastic research on whether it is best to knap at your desk or in bed covered by the BPS Research Digest. Why can’t we have more research like this? An evidence-based approach on the best day to chuck a sickie is sorely needed.

The Psychologist has an excellent article on the ‘impostor syndrome‘ with some fantastic detective work which sheds some new light on the idea.

That’s it. The Matrix is here. Mind boggling video from BoingBoing. Red pills at the ready.

New Jersey Magazine reporter Mara Altman volunteers for a study on female orgasm in the brain scanner.

There’s coverage of an odd decision by the Minnesota Supreme Court that bong water should considered an illegal substance over at the excellent Addiction Inbox.

New Scientist has an interview with Anil Seth, director of the new Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science.

There’s an awesome and in-depth post on how three studies now refute the presence of the XMRV virus in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) at Laika’s MedLibLog. See a previous Mind Hacks post for background on this controversial issue.

NPR has a fantastic brief segment on the discovery of laughing gas and why its pain killing properties were dismissed as unhelpful.

Should results from studies on suicide be kept out of the media to avoid prompting suicides? asks science writer Mun Keat Looi.

PBS has what looks like an awesome documentary on behavioural economics that’s only available online to people in the States. If it was to *cough* appear *cough* as a torrent though it would just be swell.

Dating by blood type in Japan is covered by BBC News. My blood was tested for the first time in my life the other week. It got an A+. I was very proud.

Neuroanthropology has an excellent essay about the attraction of negative news stories and the psychology of media fear-mongering.

What Happened When I Went Undercover at a Christian Gay-to-Straight Conversion Camp. A piece on AlterNet.

The Smithsonian Magazine have an archive of all their psychology and brain articles.

Darryl Cunningham’s awesome Psychiatric Tales graphic novel is out, details on his blog.

Wired notes that the US military has put out a tender for for a system to train soldiers based on their neural and cognitive responses.

Video from BBC News about a private clinic offering money to addicts to be sterilised – just arrived in the UK. Really quite screwed up.

BBC News quotes Dr Penelope Leach who says leaving babies to cry ‘harms their brains’. Talking shit apparently not a danger.

If you think she might have been taken out of context, here she is on YouTube hawking the same nonsense. ‘High cortisol’ apparently the danger. In which case, breast feeding would be ‘harming’ their brains too! No wonder my head hurts.

Salon has a review of a book on the neuropsychology of wisdom. Interesting, because wisdom is a strangely neglected topic in psychology.

Why Humans Have Sex. A podcast for the The New York Academy of Sciences oddly fails to mention wanting to check out people’s bookshelves. Maybe that’s just me?

Popular Science has a gallery of vintage robots. Old and rusty. As they should be.

Have you seen the Wiring the Brain blog? Bloody fantastic.

The New York Times publishes several letters responding to their recent article on standards in the US military’s war trauma units.

The Top 25 Psychiatric Prescriptions for 2009 are over at PsychCentral. Top 10 almost all anxiety and depression drugs. The non-specific malaise golden goose cashes in.

The New York Times has an intelligent piece by prominent psychiatrist Dan Carlat on the swing of the medication pendulum in American psychiatry.

A play about the ethics of brain scanning called Interior Traces is currently touring the UK.

Against the grain

I’ve just discovered the powerful story of the German psychiatrist Alice Ricciardi-von Platen. She refused to take part in the growing eugenics movement in the 1930s Germany that targeted people with mental illness for sterilisation and euthanasia, resisted the Nazi party and wrote a book documenting Nazi medical abuses of psychiatric patients after being asked to observe the Doctors Trial at Nuremberg.

As a result, she was ostracised from the German medical community and her book was repressed. It wasn’t rediscovered by German historians until thirty years after it was published in 1948.

Afterwards she became highly respected for her work developing group therapy and worked in Britain and Italy right into her late nineties.

There is surprisingly little about her online or in the academic literature although she received two glowing obituaries in the British press when she died in 2008.

We like to think that each of us would stand up to human rights abuses even if everyone else around us was involved but we know from countless social psychology experiments that it is an incredibly difficult thing to do. Consequently, I always have immense admiration for people like Ricciardi-von Platen who did so in the most difficult of circumstances.

We also like to think that the Nuremberg trials put an end to the political abuse of psychiatry but a recent article in Schizophrenia Bulletin tracked the history of these abusive practices noting that they have been regularly used throughout the 20th century and into the 21st.

From the Soviet use of sluggishly progressing schizophrenia to silence dissidents, to the Nazi’s incorporation of psychiatry into eugenics, to psychiatrists’ collaboration with torture during dictatorial regimes in Latin America, to China’s use of psychiatric hospitals to persecute Falun Gong members and to the collaboration with ‘war on terror’ torture in the US (albeit in the light of outright condemnation from the American Psychiatric Association).

Sadly, psychiatry has been co-opted many times over as a tool of oppression. Complacency is the enabler of these abuses and people like Alice Ricciardi-von Platen are a reminder that even the most powerful forces can be resisted.

Link to obituary from The Times.
Link to obituary from The Guardian.