<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Master and His Emissary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-53091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-53091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not finished the book yet as it is a daunting task considering how dense it is. But I do have a feeling that his discoveries concerning the divided brain are monumental and an absolute necessity for us to understand.. If I could only wrap my brain around it completely. I think there is an existential danger in being too wrapped up in a left-brain dominate society.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not finished the book yet as it is a daunting task considering how dense it is. But I do have a feeling that his discoveries concerning the divided brain are monumental and an absolute necessity for us to understand.. If I could only wrap my brain around it completely. I think there is an existential danger in being too wrapped up in a left-brain dominate society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomstafford</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomstafford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenan Malik has this great commentary:
http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/divided-brain-divided-world/

With response from McGilchrist
http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/split-brain-split-views-debating-iain-mcgilchrist/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenan Malik has this great commentary:<br />
<a href="http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/divided-brain-divided-world/" rel="nofollow">http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/divided-brain-divided-world/</a></p>
<p>With response from McGilchrist<br />
<a href="http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/split-brain-split-views-debating-iain-mcgilchrist/" rel="nofollow">http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/split-brain-split-views-debating-iain-mcgilchrist/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LWP</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LWP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://thenearsightedmonkey.tumblr.com/ (via The University of Wisconsin-Madison) has an interesting educational project going on, which leans heavily on McGilchrist&#039;s work . . . and doodling and singing and who knows what else?

And thank you, Tom Stafford, for the Peotry On The Brain link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thenearsightedmonkey.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thenearsightedmonkey.tumblr.com/</a> (via The University of Wisconsin-Madison) has an interesting educational project going on, which leans heavily on McGilchrist&#8217;s work . . . and doodling and singing and who knows what else?</p>
<p>And thank you, Tom Stafford, for the Peotry On The Brain link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomstafford</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomstafford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And here&#039;s that interview that Vaughan linked to back in 2010 and Johan remembers reading http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/interview-with-iain-mcgilchrist/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s that interview that Vaughan linked to back in 2010 and Johan remembers reading <a href="http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/interview-with-iain-mcgilchrist/" rel="nofollow">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/interview-with-iain-mcgilchrist/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually you&#039;re right that there aren&#039;t too many references to Jaynes in TMAHE, but I just happened to remember this one particularly well because it&#039;s something I specifically looked up after reading Jaynes&#039; book last year.

Must also say that TMAHE is worth repeated reading. I first read it shortly after it came out in 2010 (prompted by a mention here on Mind Hacks!), and then re-read it a year later. For me a lot of McGilchrist&#039;s ideas became a lot clearer on the second reading. I may well read it a third time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually you&#8217;re right that there aren&#8217;t too many references to Jaynes in TMAHE, but I just happened to remember this one particularly well because it&#8217;s something I specifically looked up after reading Jaynes&#8217; book last year.</p>
<p>Must also say that TMAHE is worth repeated reading. I first read it shortly after it came out in 2010 (prompted by a mention here on Mind Hacks!), and then re-read it a year later. For me a lot of McGilchrist&#8217;s ideas became a lot clearer on the second reading. I may well read it a third time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomstafford</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomstafford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the correction Johan. I used the index to track down all mentions of Jaynes, but obviously it or (more likely) my memory misled me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction Johan. I used the index to track down all mentions of Jaynes, but obviously it or (more likely) my memory misled me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/02/23/the-master-and-his-emissary/#comment-52192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=26151#comment-52192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see another mention of McGilchrist&#039;s book. However I think the comment about Julian Jaynes is a little off the mark. McGilchrist does refer to it several times, acknowledges its importance, and even states he believes that Jaynes was &#039;close to making a breakthrough&#039;. 

However, McGilchrist merely disagrees with Jaynes on one issue, albeit a crucial one. The central idea of Jaynes&#039; book is the &lt;em&gt;merging&lt;/em&gt; of a previously &#039;bicameral&#039; mind (i.e. the two hemispheres). McGilchrist argues that the phenomena described by Jaynes were actually caused by a development in the complete opposite direction: a relative &lt;em&gt;separation&lt;/em&gt; of the two hemispheres from a more unified initial state. McGilchrist elaborates on this in the first part of Chapter 8 (&#039;The ancient world&#039;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see another mention of McGilchrist&#8217;s book. However I think the comment about Julian Jaynes is a little off the mark. McGilchrist does refer to it several times, acknowledges its importance, and even states he believes that Jaynes was &#8216;close to making a breakthrough&#8217;. </p>
<p>However, McGilchrist merely disagrees with Jaynes on one issue, albeit a crucial one. The central idea of Jaynes&#8217; book is the <em>merging</em> of a previously &#8216;bicameral&#8217; mind (i.e. the two hemispheres). McGilchrist argues that the phenomena described by Jaynes were actually caused by a development in the complete opposite direction: a relative <em>separation</em> of the two hemispheres from a more unified initial state. McGilchrist elaborates on this in the first part of Chapter 8 (&#8216;The ancient world&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
