<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A brain of warring neurons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2013/01/17/a-brain-of-warring-neurons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/01/17/a-brain-of-warring-neurons/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/01/17/a-brain-of-warring-neurons/#comment-50215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25505#comment-50215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The figure of speech or of thought by which we transfer the language and ideas of a familiar science to one with which we are less acquainted may be called Scientific Metaphor.&quot;

-James Clerk Maxwell

Not all metaphors/analogies are useful explanations, but many good explanations start by making good analogies. When confronted with a genuinely new phenomenon, one can label it with new gibberish, or use analogies to explain the unknown in terms of the known. The analogies always break down, but they are a solid starting point for productive investigation.

The problem with Dennett&#039;s analogy is not that it is an analogy, but that it links two things that are equally unknown -- the brain and human society!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The figure of speech or of thought by which we transfer the language and ideas of a familiar science to one with which we are less acquainted may be called Scientific Metaphor.&#8221;</p>
<p>-James Clerk Maxwell</p>
<p>Not all metaphors/analogies are useful explanations, but many good explanations start by making good analogies. When confronted with a genuinely new phenomenon, one can label it with new gibberish, or use analogies to explain the unknown in terms of the known. The analogies always break down, but they are a solid starting point for productive investigation.</p>
<p>The problem with Dennett&#8217;s analogy is not that it is an analogy, but that it links two things that are equally unknown &#8212; the brain and human society!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joss</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2013/01/17/a-brain-of-warring-neurons/#comment-47373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25505#comment-47373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dennett has swapped one analogy for another but still hasn&#039;t understood that analogy is not explaination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennett has swapped one analogy for another but still hasn&#8217;t understood that analogy is not explaination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
