<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Column: when you want what you don&#8217;t like</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairyhedgehog</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/#comment-43777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fairyhedgehog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25223#comment-43777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting as always! Hope you&#039;re having a good Christmas and enjoying all the things you&#039;re wanting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting as always! Hope you&#8217;re having a good Christmas and enjoying all the things you&#8217;re wanting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelie</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/#comment-43677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amelie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25223#comment-43677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How interesting, thanks for this enlightening article. So people might want to watch hours of tv despite declining enjoyment. I wonder if this is why people get the impression that it&#039;s &quot;addictive&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How interesting, thanks for this enlightening article. So people might want to watch hours of tv despite declining enjoyment. I wonder if this is why people get the impression that it&#8217;s &#8220;addictive&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACQUELINE STONE</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/#comment-43674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JACQUELINE STONE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25223#comment-43674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find that it is the salt on crisps and other salty snacks that is the culprit - not the vehicle for the salt!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that it is the salt on crisps and other salty snacks that is the culprit &#8211; not the vehicle for the salt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Smith</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/12/21/wanting-vs-liking/#comment-43617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=25223#comment-43617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, and nice Christmas take on the pleasure principle. However, I take issue with separating these two circuits so definitively. The intra-cranial self-stimulation in the nucleus accumbens (as well as other areas in the mesolimbic circuity) is absolutely synapsing on the dopamine neurons there, and these in turn can excite the opioid neurons nearby. Saying that dopamine has no role in pleasure over-simplifies the matter and doesn&#039;t take into account the decades of work done on reward-learning theory and dopamine&#039;s crucial role in it.
(Sorry to be so picky, I realize this is just a short post!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, and nice Christmas take on the pleasure principle. However, I take issue with separating these two circuits so definitively. The intra-cranial self-stimulation in the nucleus accumbens (as well as other areas in the mesolimbic circuity) is absolutely synapsing on the dopamine neurons there, and these in turn can excite the opioid neurons nearby. Saying that dopamine has no role in pleasure over-simplifies the matter and doesn&#8217;t take into account the decades of work done on reward-learning theory and dopamine&#8217;s crucial role in it.<br />
(Sorry to be so picky, I realize this is just a short post!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
