<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deeper into forensic bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2012/10/23/deeper-into-forensic-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/10/23/deeper-into-forensic-bias/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: forensicshrink</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/10/23/deeper-into-forensic-bias/#comment-39330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forensicshrink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=24661#comment-39330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article, a shame really that these areas of bias remain a relatively minor step in the deeply unreflective and bias prone process that is a jury trial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article, a shame really that these areas of bias remain a relatively minor step in the deeply unreflective and bias prone process that is a jury trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelie</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/10/23/deeper-into-forensic-bias/#comment-38984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amelie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=24661#comment-38984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s too bad there&#039;s not a &quot;peer review&quot; system for forensic examiners. Although I&#039;m sure they would argue that would lengthen the process. Would be a great exercise though for students of this field to cast a critical eye on open cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad there&#8217;s not a &#8220;peer review&#8221; system for forensic examiners. Although I&#8217;m sure they would argue that would lengthen the process. Would be a great exercise though for students of this field to cast a critical eye on open cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
