<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deaf police to monitor security cameras in Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trabasack</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/#comment-36768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trabasack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=23908#comment-36768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An example of positive discrimination I suppose!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An example of positive discrimination I suppose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janis anderson</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/#comment-36753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janis anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=23908#comment-36753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deaf people are not stupid.  They can focus on seeing better than hearing people can because they can&#039;t hear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deaf people are not stupid.  They can focus on seeing better than hearing people can because they can&#8217;t hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/#comment-36417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=23908#comment-36417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great post. not offensive. sheesh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post. not offensive. sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deaf Deaf</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/#comment-36327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deaf Deaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=23908#comment-36327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please be advised that the term, “hearing impaired” is unacceptable. Here is the explanation:

The term &quot;Hearing Impaired&quot; is a technically accurate term much preferred by hearing people, largely because they view it as politically correct. In the mainstream society, to boldly state one&#039;s disability (e.g., deaf, blind, etc.) is somewhat rude and impolite. To their way of thinking, it is far better to soften the harsh reality by using the word &quot;impaired&quot; along with &quot;visual&quot;, &quot;hearing&quot;, and so on.  “Hearing-impaired” is a well-meaning word that is much-resented by deaf and hard of hearing people. This term was popular in the 70s and 80s, however, now is used mostly by doctors, audiologists and other people who are mainly interested in our ears &quot;not working.&quot;

While it&#039;s true that their hearing is not perfect, that doesn&#039;t make them impaired as people. Most would prefer to be called Deaf, Hard of Hearing or deaf when the need arises to refer to their hearing status, but not as a primary way to identify them as people (where their hearing status is not significant).

We are deaf, and not people with impairments (obstacles) in life!

Hope that you and your people respect by refusing to use the outdated and offensive term.  Hearing loss is more acceptable for everyone who is not just deaf. 

http://www.eastersealscrossroads.org/blog/2011/september/deaf-vs-hearing-impaired
http://www.deafau.org.au/info/terminology.php
http://nad.org/issues/american-sign-language/community-and-culture-faq]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please be advised that the term, “hearing impaired” is unacceptable. Here is the explanation:</p>
<p>The term &#8220;Hearing Impaired&#8221; is a technically accurate term much preferred by hearing people, largely because they view it as politically correct. In the mainstream society, to boldly state one&#8217;s disability (e.g., deaf, blind, etc.) is somewhat rude and impolite. To their way of thinking, it is far better to soften the harsh reality by using the word &#8220;impaired&#8221; along with &#8220;visual&#8221;, &#8220;hearing&#8221;, and so on.  “Hearing-impaired” is a well-meaning word that is much-resented by deaf and hard of hearing people. This term was popular in the 70s and 80s, however, now is used mostly by doctors, audiologists and other people who are mainly interested in our ears &#8220;not working.&#8221;</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that their hearing is not perfect, that doesn&#8217;t make them impaired as people. Most would prefer to be called Deaf, Hard of Hearing or deaf when the need arises to refer to their hearing status, but not as a primary way to identify them as people (where their hearing status is not significant).</p>
<p>We are deaf, and not people with impairments (obstacles) in life!</p>
<p>Hope that you and your people respect by refusing to use the outdated and offensive term.  Hearing loss is more acceptable for everyone who is not just deaf. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.eastersealscrossroads.org/blog/2011/september/deaf-vs-hearing-impaired" rel="nofollow">http://www.eastersealscrossroads.org/blog/2011/september/deaf-vs-hearing-impaired</a><br />
<a href="http://www.deafau.org.au/info/terminology.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.deafau.org.au/info/terminology.php</a><br />
<a href="http://nad.org/issues/american-sign-language/community-and-culture-faq" rel="nofollow">http://nad.org/issues/american-sign-language/community-and-culture-faq</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelie</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/09/08/deaf-police-to-monitor-security-cameras-in-mexico/#comment-36281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amelie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=23908#comment-36281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea. Most people of us have &quot;physical impairments&quot; on some scale anyway. Why draw those lines? Also, don&#039;t many undercover cops observe scenes from far away where conversations can&#039;t be heard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. Most people of us have &#8220;physical impairments&#8221; on some scale anyway. Why draw those lines? Also, don&#8217;t many undercover cops observe scenes from far away where conversations can&#8217;t be heard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
