<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring the love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2012/03/27/bring-the-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/03/27/bring-the-love/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Drost-Lopez</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2012/03/27/bring-the-love/#comment-26313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Drost-Lopez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=21919#comment-26313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did they use just the peak of the nucleus accumbens signal, or did they average it across the trial? The video definitely comes across more as outreach than science, but it is very nicely done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they use just the peak of the nucleus accumbens signal, or did they average it across the trial? The video definitely comes across more as outreach than science, but it is very nicely done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
