<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carl Jung: a character of complexes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Jung: a character of complexes « Mind Hacks &#124; Cais de Abrigo</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/#comment-21406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Jung: a character of complexes « Mind Hacks &#124; Cais de Abrigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=18225#comment-21406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read More: Carl Jung: a character of complexes « Mind Hacks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More: Carl Jung: a character of complexes « Mind Hacks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.M.Hardin</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/#comment-19881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C.M.Hardin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=18225#comment-19881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh. I still like him better than the Freud the coke-fiend and Eric ImsoneuroticInamedmyselfsonofmyselfandtriedtohidemydisabledchildfromtheworld Erickson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. I still like him better than the Freud the coke-fiend and Eric ImsoneuroticInamedmyselfsonofmyselfandtriedtohidemydisabledchildfromtheworld Erickson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 30 Days of Creativity: Sand and Shell &#124; The Art of Collecting Yourself</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/#comment-19871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[30 Days of Creativity: Sand and Shell &#124; The Art of Collecting Yourself]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=18225#comment-19871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Carl Jung: a character of complexes (mindhacks.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carl Jung: a character of complexes (mindhacks.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex C.</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2011/06/03/carl-jung-a-character-of-complexes/#comment-19841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=18225#comment-19841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the best article I&#039;ve read about Carl Jung:

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Carl+Jung%3A+the+Madame+Blavatsky+of+psychotherapy.-a0110731479

Here&#039;s an excerpt:

==============================

“Jung was a preternaturally unclear writer and thinker: he would never say anything clearly when obfuscation would do. Whether this was from lack of talent or an unconscious appreciation that clarity led to the possibility of contradiction and even refutation, no one can say…

To read Jung is to enter a world more of connotation than of denotation, of meanings hinted at rather than expressed forthrightly. To extract a definite opinion from Jung is like trying to catch an eel with soapy hands, or trap steam with a butterfly net. His esoteric erudition is formidable: it is difficult to refute a man who will not say what he means, but backs whatever he means up with a plethora of references to fourteenth-century texts.

==============================]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best article I&#8217;ve read about Carl Jung:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Carl+Jung%3A+the+Madame+Blavatsky+of+psychotherapy.-a0110731479" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Carl+Jung%3A+the+Madame+Blavatsky+of+psychotherapy.-a0110731479</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p>==============================</p>
<p>“Jung was a preternaturally unclear writer and thinker: he would never say anything clearly when obfuscation would do. Whether this was from lack of talent or an unconscious appreciation that clarity led to the possibility of contradiction and even refutation, no one can say…</p>
<p>To read Jung is to enter a world more of connotation than of denotation, of meanings hinted at rather than expressed forthrightly. To extract a definite opinion from Jung is like trying to catch an eel with soapy hands, or trap steam with a butterfly net. His esoteric erudition is formidable: it is difficult to refute a man who will not say what he means, but backs whatever he means up with a plethora of references to fourteenth-century texts.</p>
<p>==============================</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
