<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve got a certificate in armchair psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2010/11/17/ive-got-a-certificate-in-armchair-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/11/17/ive-got-a-certificate-in-armchair-psychology/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJdcaring</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/11/17/ive-got-a-certificate-in-armchair-psychology/#comment-24269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJdcaring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=15662#comment-24269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My college psychology textbook for an abnormal psych course suggests that Michael Jackson had Body Dysmorphic Disorder. I know this is most likely an idiotic assumption, but I couldn&#039;t understand why something that was clearly produced by the tabloids (ie, not at all a proven fact) would be in a college textbook to be taken as truth. If they did treat him, why is confidentiality being breeched; and if they did not, then how did these people get away with publishing this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My college psychology textbook for an abnormal psych course suggests that Michael Jackson had Body Dysmorphic Disorder. I know this is most likely an idiotic assumption, but I couldn&#8217;t understand why something that was clearly produced by the tabloids (ie, not at all a proven fact) would be in a college textbook to be taken as truth. If they did treat him, why is confidentiality being breeched; and if they did not, then how did these people get away with publishing this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psihobrlog preporučuje 25/11/2010 &#171; PsihoBrlog</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/11/17/ive-got-a-certificate-in-armchair-psychology/#comment-13349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psihobrlog preporučuje 25/11/2010 &#171; PsihoBrlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacks.com/?p=15662#comment-13349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] u medijima koji komentarišu nečije mentalno zdravlje- sa negativnog aspekta jer u svakom slučaju krše [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] u medijima koji komentarišu nečije mentalno zdravlje- sa negativnog aspekta jer u svakom slučaju krše [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
