<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attraction runs in the family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology tricks to find out what&#039;s going on inside your brain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolutionary explanations are pretty fun to devise.  Here&#039;s one that explains these results:
The organism has made it far enough to sexual maturity, so obviously it&#039;s doing something right.  Picking a mate similar looking to oneself is a good objective.  Similarity can be determined at a glance.
On the other hand, genetic diversity is also successful strategy.  So picking someone not related is an objective.  This can only be determined if the person has higher-level knowledge of the familial relationship.
The balance of the two competing objectives finds its resolution in picking someone outside the family who looks like they are in the family.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolutionary explanations are pretty fun to devise.  Here&#8217;s one that explains these results:<br />
The organism has made it far enough to sexual maturity, so obviously it&#8217;s doing something right.  Picking a mate similar looking to oneself is a good objective.  Similarity can be determined at a glance.<br />
On the other hand, genetic diversity is also successful strategy.  So picking someone not related is an objective.  This can only be determined if the person has higher-level knowledge of the familial relationship.<br />
The balance of the two competing objectives finds its resolution in picking someone outside the family who looks like they are in the family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Leslie</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Leslie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, though I do agree with Michael D.
The definition of a Freudian slip, of course, is when you say one thing and mean a mother.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, though I do agree with Michael D.<br />
The definition of a Freudian slip, of course, is when you say one thing and mean a mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/attraction-runs-in-the-family/#comment-4696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important assumption in the interpretation is that participants know how to separate their feelings of sexual attraction from those of familiarity or general positivity, and I&#039;m not sure I buy it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important assumption in the interpretation is that participants know how to separate their feelings of sexual attraction from those of familiarity or general positivity, and I&#8217;m not sure I buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

