<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain scanning unborn babies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology tricks to find out what&#039;s going on inside your brain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neuroskeptic</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuroskeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PJ: At least where I work the prohibition on pregnant women is explicitly described as a precaution only, everyone involved agrees there is no evidence that it causes harm, but &quot;better safe than sorry&quot;.
It&#039;s not a big deal because we don&#039;t exclude women who could be pregnant, only women who actually know that they are.
On the other hand if we&#039;re giving people any kind of drug, we require pregnancy tests.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ: At least where I work the prohibition on pregnant women is explicitly described as a precaution only, everyone involved agrees there is no evidence that it causes harm, but &#8220;better safe than sorry&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s not a big deal because we don&#8217;t exclude women who could be pregnant, only women who actually know that they are.<br />
On the other hand if we&#8217;re giving people any kind of drug, we require pregnancy tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course it also makes you wonder why so much time and effort is spent on avoiding scanning pregnant women in adult fMRI studies when there is ethical approval and active research scanning foetuses.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it also makes you wonder why so much time and effort is spent on avoiding scanning pregnant women in adult fMRI studies when there is ethical approval and active research scanning foetuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redclairet</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redclairet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/brain-scanning-unborn-babies/#comment-5362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just one word - Wow.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one word &#8211; Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

