Happiness is not universal

Photo by Flickr user kalandrakas. Click for sourceThe latest edition of the journal Emotion has a fascinating study comparing common concepts of happiness and unhappiness between Americans and Japanese people. While we tend to think that ‘happiness’ is a universal concept, it turns out that we think of it in quite culturally specific ways.

Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations.

Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):441-56.

Uchida Y, Kitayama S.

Cultural folk models of happiness and unhappiness are likely to have important bearings on social cognition and social behavior. At present, however, little is known about the nature of these models. Here, the authors systematically analyzed American and Japanese participants’ spontaneously produced descriptions of the two emotions and observed, as predicted, that whereas Americans associated positive hedonic experience of happiness with personal achievement, Japanese associated it with social harmony.

Furthermore, Japanese were more likely than Americans to mention both social disruption and transcendental reappraisal as features of happiness. As also predicted, unlike happiness, descriptions of unhappiness included various culture-specific coping actions: Whereas Americans focused on externalizing behavior (e.g., anger and aggression), Japanese highlighted transcendental reappraisal and self-improvement. Implications for research on culture and emotion are discussed.

Link to PubMed entry for the study.

5 Comments

  1. Nicole
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    As usual, the aftermath of your post was revealing and one of the outcomes was this – http://www.theschooloflife.com/About – which I would be surprised if you didn’t know about already, though the search on your blog did not bring it up specifically. Cheers.

  2. George
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    Great post, thank you. The authors have written about the theme before. Here ist a link to an free available pdf:
    http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43061/1/10902_2004_Article_5278785.pdf
    Bye
    George

  3. Mark(p.s.)
    Posted August 11, 2009 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    With the fact that happiness can be dependant on the social culture the question:
    Does the cultural differences in defining Happiness affect the success rate-efficacy of antidepressant medication? (in different countries)

  4. wirx
    Posted August 12, 2009 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Chinese is lack mindhelping medication.So,antidepressant medication mainly depand on pills.

  5. Posted August 18, 2009 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    This brings up an interesting question. Is the West’s idea of happiness, individual success, antagonistic to the human’s evolutionary psychology? Humans are HIGHLY social, and, therefor, social success should be top priority for such a social animal, but when individual success is the measure for which we are happy, and for an individual to succeed they must take from another (limited resource model), does it create antagonistic feelings within the human psyche?
    Could this be a possible explanation of the West’s, especially America, higher incidence of depression, anger and criminal behavior. If our, the West’s, collective psychology, cultural cognition (individualism) was more aligned with our evolutionary psychology (socialism), like the East’s, would we be more aligned and have less internal conflict with ourselves?
    [Cerebrl]


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 707 other followers