Comments on: DSM-V bun fight in full swing http://mindhacks.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/ Neuroscience and psychology news and views. Fri, 17 May 2013 22:36:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: talesofacrazypsychmajor http://mindhacks.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16270 Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:40:16 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16270 Agreed. I doubt anyone thinks the DSM V won’t happen. It’s all a matter of what goes inside it. That comment about his conflict of interests doesn’t make sense.

]]> By: Thomas Westgard http://mindhacks.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16251 Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:07:16 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16251 Sounds like several people involved may be a little too attached to the deprecated Narcissistic Personality Disorder diagnosis!

]]> By: T http://mindhacks.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16250 Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:19:25 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-16250 I find that argument odd given that the DSM-V is going to come out whether those specific changes are in place or not, so what’s actually in the DSM-V would be of no concern to him either way, really, from that standpoint.

You make a good point about them playing the conflict-of-interest card, though.

]]> By: Lilian Nattel http://mindhacks.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-5538 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:59:01 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/dsm-v-bun-fight-in-full-swing/#comment-5538 They might not be better off but I think it’s a box that would be best opened.

]]>