<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valuing the unusual illness debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer R. Ewing</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer R. Ewing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have often felt that doctors routinely use  &quot;diagnoses&quot; such as PTSD, ADD and hyperactivity incorrectly.  Doctors either don&#039;t have the training and background to assess such conditions correctly, or they use them to palliate drug seekers who want a fix, or parents who don&#039;t want to believe that their parenting skills, or lack thereof, could posssibly cause/contribute to their child&#039;s behavior.
.
I chat online frequently, and I&#039;ve come across many people who either gleefully crow about how they received disability by &quot;getting over&quot; on the system, or who whine about not getting disability because they can&#039;t seem to understand that Uncle Sam isn&#039;t interested in helping people who have a dishonorable discharge on their record because of their own misconduct.
.
I absolutely agree that psychiatric diagnoses frequently have their basis in a &quot;value judgment&quot; made by the physician.  The problem occurs when the &quot;diagnosis&quot; occurs as a rush *to* judgment, to make their patients (or parents of same) happy.  But, unfortunately, psychiatry/psychology is not an exact science.  Drug seeking patients know this, and so do lazy parents.
.
Which is not to say that such diagnoses are &quot;always&quot; wrong.  I fully accept that many honest people in the mental health profession make such diagnoses with purely honorable intentions.  But nobody&#039;s perfect.  Drug seekers have their wiles honed to a fine art.  And sometimes even the best doctors just want persistent parents to go away and leave them alone, and if writing a Ritalin script will accomplish that, then so be it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often felt that doctors routinely use  &#8220;diagnoses&#8221; such as PTSD, ADD and hyperactivity incorrectly.  Doctors either don&#8217;t have the training and background to assess such conditions correctly, or they use them to palliate drug seekers who want a fix, or parents who don&#8217;t want to believe that their parenting skills, or lack thereof, could posssibly cause/contribute to their child&#8217;s behavior.<br />
.<br />
I chat online frequently, and I&#8217;ve come across many people who either gleefully crow about how they received disability by &#8220;getting over&#8221; on the system, or who whine about not getting disability because they can&#8217;t seem to understand that Uncle Sam isn&#8217;t interested in helping people who have a dishonorable discharge on their record because of their own misconduct.<br />
.<br />
I absolutely agree that psychiatric diagnoses frequently have their basis in a &#8220;value judgment&#8221; made by the physician.  The problem occurs when the &#8220;diagnosis&#8221; occurs as a rush *to* judgment, to make their patients (or parents of same) happy.  But, unfortunately, psychiatry/psychology is not an exact science.  Drug seeking patients know this, and so do lazy parents.<br />
.<br />
Which is not to say that such diagnoses are &#8220;always&#8221; wrong.  I fully accept that many honest people in the mental health profession make such diagnoses with purely honorable intentions.  But nobody&#8217;s perfect.  Drug seekers have their wiles honed to a fine art.  And sometimes even the best doctors just want persistent parents to go away and leave them alone, and if writing a Ritalin script will accomplish that, then so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterhase</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enterhase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheesh! Just when I thought my ploy intolerance disorder (PID) was starting to subside, I read this. Gotta see my doc.
Great article, btw. Informative and balanced.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh! Just when I thought my ploy intolerance disorder (PID) was starting to subside, I read this. Gotta see my doc.<br />
Great article, btw. Informative and balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/valuing-the-unusual-illness-debate/#comment-5626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very thought-provoking post...and trying to view mental illness through a different perspective is a good exercise. I do worry that &#039;normality&#039; is defined too narrowly sometimes.
This blog is constantly fascinating to me, by the way, thank you.
(P.S. I think you have the wrong link up to the New Scientist orgasm article in the weekly round up post...!)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very thought-provoking post&#8230;and trying to view mental illness through a different perspective is a good exercise. I do worry that &#8216;normality&#8217; is defined too narrowly sometimes.<br />
This blog is constantly fascinating to me, by the way, thank you.<br />
(P.S. I think you have the wrong link up to the New Scientist orgasm article in the weekly round up post&#8230;!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
