<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigarette smoking lady cops to read minds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gagoonies</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-15224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gagoonies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-15224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cops are filthy scum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cops are filthy scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tin man</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tin man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe they could use &#039;em in the courtroom, especially suitable for capital crimes.  deus ex machina, anyone?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they could use &#8216;em in the courtroom, especially suitable for capital crimes.  deus ex machina, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian Nattel</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lilian Nattel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eye rolling.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eye rolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anibal</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anibal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are now seeing a much progress in inferences of phenomenology from brain data (Haynes et al. 2007, &quot;Reading hidden intentions in the human brain&quot; Curr. Biol. 17 (4)
And more recently the possibility of use fMRI data in the court as  evidence to spot lies.
Scientists (Logothetis 2008) know that neuroimaging technology its only a rude way to look at the brain. Its signal is mixed indicating more than glucose input to synaptic activity.
But what striking me is that in some areas the use of neuroimaging is accepted as a proof test while not in others.
For example, Dr. Adrian Owen studies with people suffering from disorders of conciousness is a clear cautionary note: not hurry yourself in making decisions about the end of life because there are residual signals of possible consciousness.
Why this discrepancy?
This could only bring more confussion to the general public.
Regarding the evolution of media. I foresight as well the death of printable formats or at least a very limited niche. Internet is displacing them.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are now seeing a much progress in inferences of phenomenology from brain data (Haynes et al. 2007, &#8220;Reading hidden intentions in the human brain&#8221; Curr. Biol. 17 (4)<br />
And more recently the possibility of use fMRI data in the court as  evidence to spot lies.<br />
Scientists (Logothetis 2008) know that neuroimaging technology its only a rude way to look at the brain. Its signal is mixed indicating more than glucose input to synaptic activity.<br />
But what striking me is that in some areas the use of neuroimaging is accepted as a proof test while not in others.<br />
For example, Dr. Adrian Owen studies with people suffering from disorders of conciousness is a clear cautionary note: not hurry yourself in making decisions about the end of life because there are residual signals of possible consciousness.<br />
Why this discrepancy?<br />
This could only bring more confussion to the general public.<br />
Regarding the evolution of media. I foresight as well the death of printable formats or at least a very limited niche. Internet is displacing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Gray</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/cigarette-smoking-lady-cops-to-read-minds/#comment-5893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A desperate attempt by newspapers to stop the losses in the immediate short-term? Perhaps if they say incredibly off-the-wall things, they will sell more papers right now...
What&#039;s that, you say? That will ruin their credibility in the long-run and actually inhibit future sales?
Doesn&#039;t matter, they already know they&#039;re on a sinking ship, so sell the papers while you can!!!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A desperate attempt by newspapers to stop the losses in the immediate short-term? Perhaps if they say incredibly off-the-wall things, they will sell more papers right now&#8230;<br />
What&#8217;s that, you say? That will ruin their credibility in the long-run and actually inhibit future sales?<br />
Doesn&#8217;t matter, they already know they&#8217;re on a sinking ship, so sell the papers while you can!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
