Comments on: ‘Internet addiction’ lacks validity finds another study http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/ Neuroscience and psychology news and views. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: buy wow gold http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6059 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:44:07 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6059 Yes, the study is just a small percentage of users.

]]> By: buy wow gold http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6058 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:43:31 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6058 Yes, the study is just a small percentage of users.

]]> By: Dr Shock http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6057 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:43:44 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6057 What especially upset me was the phrase that they didn’t compare it to the golden standard which is essential in validating questionnaires. Their apology was that was no golden standard while any experienced clinician is exactly that and the ideal golden standard.
Kind regards Dr Shock

]]> By: Lilian Nattel http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6056 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:51:58 +0000 http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/internet-addiction-lacks-validity-finds-another-study/#comment-6056 Good thing this study was done before the DSM V was finalized!

]]>