<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voodoo accusations false, reply &#8216;red list&#8217; researchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: important!!</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-46745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[important!!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-46745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How have they discovered that how your brain responds to social stressors can influence the body’s immune system in ways that may negatively affect health ? They are trying to discover this by ,deliberately causing un-consenting subjects to suffer extreme amounts of long term social dis-tressors while they go about interacting in their real-time daily lives!

   What UCLA&#039;s Dr. Naomi Eisenberger and Dr. Matthew Lieberman do to obtain their research data is...

       1. With the help of people they hire from a company named &quot;North Vector Inc&quot;..they deliberately make a unknowing subject&#039;s real-time social environment so intolerable ,so the subject will begin to suffer extreme amounts of long term distress!  Soon, the subject is tortured so badly by their systematic stressors that they lose everything which makes them suffer from large amounts of loss ..ect..and soon find their real-time lives destroyed ...so, these horrible Social Psychologists can observe and map these subjects as they go thru the painful stages of deterioration that one suffers when they are suffering from long term distress! Their research projects must be stopped!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How have they discovered that how your brain responds to social stressors can influence the body’s immune system in ways that may negatively affect health ? They are trying to discover this by ,deliberately causing un-consenting subjects to suffer extreme amounts of long term social dis-tressors while they go about interacting in their real-time daily lives!</p>
<p>   What UCLA&#8217;s Dr. Naomi Eisenberger and Dr. Matthew Lieberman do to obtain their research data is&#8230;</p>
<p>       1. With the help of people they hire from a company named &#8220;North Vector Inc&#8221;..they deliberately make a unknowing subject&#8217;s real-time social environment so intolerable ,so the subject will begin to suffer extreme amounts of long term distress!  Soon, the subject is tortured so badly by their systematic stressors that they lose everything which makes them suffer from large amounts of loss ..ect..and soon find their real-time lives destroyed &#8230;so, these horrible Social Psychologists can observe and map these subjects as they go thru the painful stages of deterioration that one suffers when they are suffering from long term distress! Their research projects must be stopped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-16577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-16577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Matthew Lieberman and Dr. Naomi Eisenberger are guilty of horrible unethical research misconduct! They conduct environmentally manipulated unethical research experiments on unconsenting and unknowing individuals (in real time) while these individuals are living out their daily lives!

They have people , that will go out ,and deliberately manipulate a person’s (real-time) social environment in an extremely negative, unpleasant and intolerable way that causes that individual to be faced with problems that will cause them to suffer from long term social and emotional distress!

They purposely manipulate an individuals daily social environment in a negative way, so that they will begin to suffer extreme amounts of emotional and visceral pain on a daily basis …all, due to the problems that dr. Matthew Lieberman and dr. Naomi Eisenberger’s group has deliberately caused for them!

Their victims begins to suffer long episodes of rejection, isolation, ostracism, loss, abandonment and cannot find any social support. They are not told why or who has done this to them! Their lives are deliberately destroyed !They begin to suffer extreme amounts of pain all …so , Dr. Matthew Lieberman and his wife, UCLA’s Dr. Naomi Eisenberger can get a more original view of individuals suffering from social distress! The focus of their research experiments!

Dr. Matthew Lieberman and Dr. Naomi Eisenberger ‘ s research projects need to be investigated ,
shut down and held accountable for the lives and health of the individuals that they have tortured and destroyed all for their own financial greed, job security and to manipulate a way to get their research published in journals!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Matthew Lieberman and Dr. Naomi Eisenberger are guilty of horrible unethical research misconduct! They conduct environmentally manipulated unethical research experiments on unconsenting and unknowing individuals (in real time) while these individuals are living out their daily lives!</p>
<p>They have people , that will go out ,and deliberately manipulate a person’s (real-time) social environment in an extremely negative, unpleasant and intolerable way that causes that individual to be faced with problems that will cause them to suffer from long term social and emotional distress!</p>
<p>They purposely manipulate an individuals daily social environment in a negative way, so that they will begin to suffer extreme amounts of emotional and visceral pain on a daily basis …all, due to the problems that dr. Matthew Lieberman and dr. Naomi Eisenberger’s group has deliberately caused for them!</p>
<p>Their victims begins to suffer long episodes of rejection, isolation, ostracism, loss, abandonment and cannot find any social support. They are not told why or who has done this to them! Their lives are deliberately destroyed !They begin to suffer extreme amounts of pain all …so , Dr. Matthew Lieberman and his wife, UCLA’s Dr. Naomi Eisenberger can get a more original view of individuals suffering from social distress! The focus of their research experiments!</p>
<p>Dr. Matthew Lieberman and Dr. Naomi Eisenberger ‘ s research projects need to be investigated ,<br />
shut down and held accountable for the lives and health of the individuals that they have tortured and destroyed all for their own financial greed, job security and to manipulate a way to get their research published in journals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Lieberman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were invited by the same journal to write an official reply to the Vul et al. paper.  Here is a link.
http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply).pdf
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were invited by the same journal to write an official reply to the Vul et al. paper.  Here is a link.<br />
<a href="http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply)" rel="nofollow">http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply)</a>.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Lieberman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is our invited reply
http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply).pdf
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is our invited reply<br />
<a href="http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply)" rel="nofollow">http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkmanWager(invitedreply)</a>.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/voodoo-accusations-false-reply-red-list-researchers/#comment-6100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I rather enjoyed the Vul et al article and rejoinder, but I cringe now to hear that they did not bother to contact the authors listed in their report, even after they&#039;d clearly already been in touch with every author via their survey.
While there was no official onus on the Vul et al team to contact the authors listed in their critique to notify these authors of the accepted Vul et al paper, doing so would have been a polite way of avoiding the type of reaction experienced by Dr. Singer and thereby reduce the likelihood of serious animosity in an already critical context.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather enjoyed the Vul et al article and rejoinder, but I cringe now to hear that they did not bother to contact the authors listed in their report, even after they&#8217;d clearly already been in touch with every author via their survey.<br />
While there was no official onus on the Vul et al team to contact the authors listed in their critique to notify these authors of the accepted Vul et al paper, doing so would have been a polite way of avoiding the type of reaction experienced by Dr. Singer and thereby reduce the likelihood of serious animosity in an already critical context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
