<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political bias in the interpretation of neuroscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2008/09/23/political-bias-in-the-interpretation-of-neuroscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/09/23/political-bias-in-the-interpretation-of-neuroscience/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dac99a</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/09/23/political-bias-in-the-interpretation-of-neuroscience/#comment-6358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dac99a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/political-bias-in-the-interpretation-of-neuroscience/#comment-6358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad someone finally said it. It is funny how one can be part of a discipline that recognizes the existence and power of biased opinions, yet continue to deny one&#039;s own bias.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad someone finally said it. It is funny how one can be part of a discipline that recognizes the existence and power of biased opinions, yet continue to deny one&#8217;s own bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
