<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio rising high illusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaughan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/#comment-6512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi JM, thanks for the correction. Now fixed! And thanks for suggesting the track, I shall try and track it down, it sounds great.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JM, thanks for the correction. Now fixed! And thanks for suggesting the track, I shall try and track it down, it sounds great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/#comment-6511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/audio-rising-high-illusion/#comment-6511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Note the correct spelling: &quot;Shepard&quot;)
I think it would be called a Shepard scale, since it&#039;s not one single tone, but it&#039;s the same effect.  Upper octaves fade out and lower octaves fade in, and we hear them as fused into single tones because they&#039;re at harmonic (1:2) ratios.  I usually compare it to an old spinning barbershop pole when I describe it.
Incidentally, some give composer James Tenney more credit for it than Roger Shepard, but I only heard that from a student of Tenney&#039;s.  His composition &quot;For Ann (Rising)&quot; is beautiful; it uses a Shepard tone.
JM
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Note the correct spelling: &#8220;Shepard&#8221;)<br />
I think it would be called a Shepard scale, since it&#8217;s not one single tone, but it&#8217;s the same effect.  Upper octaves fade out and lower octaves fade in, and we hear them as fused into single tones because they&#8217;re at harmonic (1:2) ratios.  I usually compare it to an old spinning barbershop pole when I describe it.<br />
Incidentally, some give composer James Tenney more credit for it than Roger Shepard, but I only heard that from a student of Tenney&#8217;s.  His composition &#8220;For Ann (Rising)&#8221; is beautiful; it uses a Shepard tone.<br />
JM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
