<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A wife rating scale from the 1930s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Pacente</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/#comment-25919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula Pacente]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/#comment-25919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with this survey is that it assumes EVERY couple has children. Therefore it is skewed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this survey is that it assumes EVERY couple has children. Therefore it is skewed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/#comment-6677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/a-wife-rating-scale-from-the-1930s/#comment-6677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the most amazing one was that &quot;can carry on an interesting conversation&quot; was only worth one merit point.  In other words, it&#039;s approximately as important as sewing buttons onto things.  Ugh.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the most amazing one was that &#8220;can carry on an interesting conversation&#8221; was only worth one merit point.  In other words, it&#8217;s approximately as important as sewing buttons onto things.  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
