<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freud widely taught, except in psychology departments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/#comment-26076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/#comment-26076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freudian psychology dates back 80-100 years, what might his views be if he lived another 50 years on ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freudian psychology dates back 80-100 years, what might his views be if he lived another 50 years on ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/#comment-7019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/freud-widely-taught-except-in-psychology-departments/#comment-7019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Other reasons for the teaching of freud in the humanities
a) it&#039;s cheap --- all you need to analyse a book is some time. Analysing a person requires consent, and expensive training, and the expectation that you&#039;ll provide what you promise, or at least do no harm
b) mainstream psychology is far less loose, discourse-wise. There is a mainstream (evidence-based, cognitivist) which squeezes out other approaches. Humanities have more capacity (even a need?) for comparing and contrasting different approaches perhaps.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other reasons for the teaching of freud in the humanities<br />
a) it&#8217;s cheap &#8212; all you need to analyse a book is some time. Analysing a person requires consent, and expensive training, and the expectation that you&#8217;ll provide what you promise, or at least do no harm<br />
b) mainstream psychology is far less loose, discourse-wise. There is a mainstream (evidence-based, cognitivist) which squeezes out other approaches. Humanities have more capacity (even a need?) for comparing and contrasting different approaches perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
