<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The benefits of inheriting despair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2007/02/27/the-benefits-of-inheriting-despair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2007/02/27/the-benefits-of-inheriting-despair/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anibal</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2007/02/27/the-benefits-of-inheriting-despair/#comment-7490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anibal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/27/the-benefits-of-inheriting-despair/#comment-7490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the evolutionary origins of mental illness (in particular Schizophrenia), or what is sometimes called the darwinian paradox (e.g. Why deleterious traits persist when those traits prevent biological fitness- the quantity of  offspring organisms leave-)
T. Crow is suggesting that schizophrenia is at the basis our unique capacity to speak and  language. But he shows skepticism with some evolutionary explanations because some of the advantages that they posit are not at the level or in the same dimension of the disadvantages, say, we cannot  expect that a given disorder centered around a cluster of disfunctions could improve certain functions center around another cluster.
When talking on depression some evolutionary explanations suggest an anlogy with pain as an interoceptive or homeostatic signal, but in the case of depression, as a signal that some behaviours of the individual is compromissing its fittness.
In this point i¬¥m skeptic as well, because women that have been mothers recently but suffer post-partum depression, why they have depression interpreted in this sense; having a child increase their fittness don¬¥t you think?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the evolutionary origins of mental illness (in particular Schizophrenia), or what is sometimes called the darwinian paradox (e.g. Why deleterious traits persist when those traits prevent biological fitness- the quantity of  offspring organisms leave-)<br />
T. Crow is suggesting that schizophrenia is at the basis our unique capacity to speak and  language. But he shows skepticism with some evolutionary explanations because some of the advantages that they posit are not at the level or in the same dimension of the disadvantages, say, we cannot  expect that a given disorder centered around a cluster of disfunctions could improve certain functions center around another cluster.<br />
When talking on depression some evolutionary explanations suggest an anlogy with pain as an interoceptive or homeostatic signal, but in the case of depression, as a signal that some behaviours of the individual is compromissing its fittness.<br />
In this point i¬¥m skeptic as well, because women that have been mothers recently but suffer post-partum depression, why they have depression interpreted in this sense; having a child increase their fittness don¬¥t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
