<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nature Neuroscience launches monthly podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2006/10/27/nature-neuroscience-launches-monthly-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2006/10/27/nature-neuroscience-launches-monthly-podcast/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2006/10/27/nature-neuroscience-launches-monthly-podcast/#comment-7736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2006/10/27/nature-neuroscience-launches-monthly-podcast/#comment-7736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Research highlights section Nature often presents research published in other journals (e.g. PNAS). Coudlnt the argument of giving free advertising to commercial rivals be applied in that case? Or is it just a metter of a degree of publicity (highlights vs. podcast)?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Research highlights section Nature often presents research published in other journals (e.g. PNAS). Coudlnt the argument of giving free advertising to commercial rivals be applied in that case? Or is it just a metter of a degree of publicity (highlights vs. podcast)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
