<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncovering hidden biases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Boring</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders Boring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/#comment-7991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some problems with their methodology.
While doing the test I found that when answering against my biases, I didn&#039;t care whether I had the right or wrong answer, since a wrong answer felt like a moral victory, while a right answer was an in game victory.
When answering with my biases, I found that it became very important for me to give the right answer, so I found myself hesitating far more thus giving a slower response, which is in contradiction of the assumption.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some problems with their methodology.<br />
While doing the test I found that when answering against my biases, I didn&#8217;t care whether I had the right or wrong answer, since a wrong answer felt like a moral victory, while a right answer was an in game victory.<br />
When answering with my biases, I found that it became very important for me to give the right answer, so I found myself hesitating far more thus giving a slower response, which is in contradiction of the assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pronoia</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/#comment-7990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pronoia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2006/04/24/uncovering-hidden-biases/#comment-7990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way that I&#039;ve come to think about the &quot;implicit associations&quot; mentioned here are as activated areas in that preconscious (in Freud&#039;s terms) limbo.  It sits somewhat obscured from our attention somewhere between the conscious and subconscious and it functions like a waiting room, ready to let you remember stories, facts, and I think even emotions, judgements, and biases that have recently been run through your consciousness (from dreams, recent events, etc).  Occupants of this chamber do seem to slowly settle into real biases over time, but in particular with this implicit bias test, they&#039;ve found that by priming participants with concepts before the test that either inforce or contradict their internal biases you can sway your results pretty dramatically.  So, in a sense, these tests measure the current ecosystem of your preconscious... and I was disturbed to find out how I scored on them... but then after this came to my attention I spent 10 minutes reading up on information that contradicted my biases and retook the test with much better results.  I bet that with a bit of training, tools like this would help us recognize and remove undesired biases from our subconscious... it would even be an interesting, if slightly controversial, tool to bring into schools.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way that I&#8217;ve come to think about the &#8220;implicit associations&#8221; mentioned here are as activated areas in that preconscious (in Freud&#8217;s terms) limbo.  It sits somewhat obscured from our attention somewhere between the conscious and subconscious and it functions like a waiting room, ready to let you remember stories, facts, and I think even emotions, judgements, and biases that have recently been run through your consciousness (from dreams, recent events, etc).  Occupants of this chamber do seem to slowly settle into real biases over time, but in particular with this implicit bias test, they&#8217;ve found that by priming participants with concepts before the test that either inforce or contradict their internal biases you can sway your results pretty dramatically.  So, in a sense, these tests measure the current ecosystem of your preconscious&#8230; and I was disturbed to find out how I scored on them&#8230; but then after this came to my attention I spent 10 minutes reading up on information that contradicted my biases and retook the test with much better results.  I bet that with a bit of training, tools like this would help us recognize and remove undesired biases from our subconscious&#8230; it would even be an interesting, if slightly controversial, tool to bring into schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
