<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A problem with placebo-controlled trials?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/#comment-8154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/#comment-8154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi tom
yeh, he basically said that the placebo effect in trials for the banned drugs was larger than it had been in the trials demonstrating the efficacy of fluoxetine. i don&#039;t have any more detail on that unfortunately. he also said that for other conditions where efficacy of ssri&#039;s had been demonstrated (e.g. OCD), the placebo effect had been smaller there too. so you end up with a weird situation: drugs for conditions (like OCD) that are less responsive to placebo effects, don&#039;t have to demonstrate as great an impact on symptoms (to be deemed effective), compared with drugs being tested for conditions ilke depression, that are highly responsive to placebo effects.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi tom<br />
yeh, he basically said that the placebo effect in trials for the banned drugs was larger than it had been in the trials demonstrating the efficacy of fluoxetine. i don&#8217;t have any more detail on that unfortunately. he also said that for other conditions where efficacy of ssri&#8217;s had been demonstrated (e.g. OCD), the placebo effect had been smaller there too. so you end up with a weird situation: drugs for conditions (like OCD) that are less responsive to placebo effects, don&#8217;t have to demonstrate as great an impact on symptoms (to be deemed effective), compared with drugs being tested for conditions ilke depression, that are highly responsive to placebo effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2005/12/08/a-problem-with-placebo-controlled-trials/#comment-8153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really interesting. Presumably you could look at the original papers and see how big the placebo effect was? Some variation in the size of placebo effect would be expected - is Dr Santosh suggesting that there  is systemmatic variation between different drug trials?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting. Presumably you could look at the original papers and see how big the placebo effect was? Some variation in the size of placebo effect would be expected &#8211; is Dr Santosh suggesting that there  is systemmatic variation between different drug trials?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
