<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware the Jabberwack, my son</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/#comment-8245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun Guardian article about this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1574855,00.html
//quote
I do recall one or two less satisfying conversations with human beings, but only one or two. Yet there were moments while speaking with George when I realised that I was, semi-consciously, assuming the presence of a human at the other end. Examining the logs from his site, Carpenter has found that people converse online with George for up to seven hours.
People act, then, as if George thinks. Does he? &quot;We bring a lot of baggage to words like &#039;thinking&#039;,&quot; Carpenter says. &quot;Our understanding is very human-centric, and in any of the ways that we think about those words, it obviously doesn&#039;t think. But if you put it another way, my program would know precisely nothing about language, had it not learned. So, to a reasonable degree, you could say that it&#039;s building a non-human form of understanding.&quot;
//end quote
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun Guardian article about this:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1574855,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1574855,00.html</a><br />
//quote<br />
I do recall one or two less satisfying conversations with human beings, but only one or two. Yet there were moments while speaking with George when I realised that I was, semi-consciously, assuming the presence of a human at the other end. Examining the logs from his site, Carpenter has found that people converse online with George for up to seven hours.<br />
People act, then, as if George thinks. Does he? &#8220;We bring a lot of baggage to words like &#8216;thinking&#8217;,&#8221; Carpenter says. &#8220;Our understanding is very human-centric, and in any of the ways that we think about those words, it obviously doesn&#8217;t think. But if you put it another way, my program would know precisely nothing about language, had it not learned. So, to a reasonable degree, you could say that it&#8217;s building a non-human form of understanding.&#8221;<br />
//end quote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2005/09/21/beware-the-jabberwack-my-son/#comment-8244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From reading those transcripts, it seems to me that neither the program nor the judges make a lot of sense!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From reading those transcripts, it seems to me that neither the program nor the judges make a lot of sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
