<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Male faces with feminine features more attractive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2005/02/13/male-faces-with-feminine-features-more-attractive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/02/13/male-faces-with-feminine-features-more-attractive/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology news and views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fradera</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2005/02/13/male-faces-with-feminine-features-more-attractive/#comment-8547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Fradera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2005/02/13/male-faces-with-feminine-features-more-attractive/#comment-8547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penton-Voak (personality in face researcher) talked about this - apparently, though, things get interesting when you switch from static to dynamic input: using video the masculine faces are often rated better, and there&#039;s an idea that macho faces code for potential threat, which an image does nothing to dispell (being a fixed slice of time), but if you see the person acting non-agressively then this is discounted. I can&#039;t remember the precise details though.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penton-Voak (personality in face researcher) talked about this &#8211; apparently, though, things get interesting when you switch from static to dynamic input: using video the masculine faces are often rated better, and there&#8217;s an idea that macho faces code for potential threat, which an image does nothing to dispell (being a fixed slice of time), but if you see the person acting non-agressively then this is discounted. I can&#8217;t remember the precise details though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
