<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cultivated Perception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindhacks.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindhacks.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and psychology tricks to find out what&#039;s going on inside your brain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogamy</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/#comment-8609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[technogamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/#comment-8609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is quite interesting!  I recall watching -- when I was very young -- a television show on which scientists were using a pupil-tracking device to monitor the areas of an image at which a viewed was looking, and to determine the pupil&#039;s &quot;path&quot; through the image.  You note: &quot;Then I noticed that, perceptually, I wasn&#039;t automatically grouping the answers with their appropriate tick boxes.&quot;  Do you feel that this pupil-path notion is identical to, or perhaps, another aspect of, your notions about grouping of objects and cultivated perception?  Is pupil path cultivated?  (When I read a question in a questionnaire, irrespective of the fact tht I know it is a questionnaire, my pupil spills past the question mark looking for the next sentence; the shorter the &quot;pupil drop&quot; to the tick boxes, the more _embedded_ I feel in the question -- in a sense, the tick boxes are just part of an interactive sentence.)     &#124;&#124;&#124; :] &#124;&#124;&#124;  gabriel
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite interesting!  I recall watching &#8212; when I was very young &#8212; a television show on which scientists were using a pupil-tracking device to monitor the areas of an image at which a viewed was looking, and to determine the pupil&#8217;s &#8220;path&#8221; through the image.  You note: &#8220;Then I noticed that, perceptually, I wasn&#8217;t automatically grouping the answers with their appropriate tick boxes.&#8221;  Do you feel that this pupil-path notion is identical to, or perhaps, another aspect of, your notions about grouping of objects and cultivated perception?  Is pupil path cultivated?  (When I read a question in a questionnaire, irrespective of the fact tht I know it is a questionnaire, my pupil spills past the question mark looking for the next sentence; the shorter the &#8220;pupil drop&#8221; to the tick boxes, the more _embedded_ I feel in the question &#8212; in a sense, the tick boxes are just part of an interactive sentence.)     ||| :] |||  gabriel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiMail</title>
		<link>http://mindhacks.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/#comment-8610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AntiMail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindhacksblog.wordpress.com/2004/12/17/cultivated-perception/#comment-8610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;re: Book: Mind hacks&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>re: Book: Mind hacks</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

